Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Kode Vicious Cycles On

Kode Vicious Cycles On Kode Vicious Cycles On kode vicious A koder with attitude, KV ANSWERS Not only does California give you plenty of MISS MANNERS HE AIN ™T. sun, it also apparently has employers that give you plenty of time to play around with the œsmaller problems  that you like, in a programming language that ™s irrelevant to the later implementation. It may be convenient, but it ™s actually very dangerous to solve your favorite problem rst and then add the dif cult, not-liked stuff later. Examples: Security ”can it be added later? No! Read the pleas of guilty in œPatching the Enterprise  by George Brandman (ACM Queue, March 2005: 32-39)! Performance ”can it be added later? No! Look into the faces of all the frustrated software reengineers. Even more frustrating than the lack of sunshine in my country is the absence of employers that give you time to play around with scripting languages when project deadlines impend and budgets are already overspent. We are forced to make good overall designs rst and then improve them iteratively. Oh, California ”the land of milk and honey and bicycling in the sun! YOUR QUESTIONS. S ummer has descended upon us, in http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Queue Association for Computing Machinery

Kode Vicious Cycles On

Queue , Volume 3 (6) – Jul 1, 2005

Loading next page...
 
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/kode-vicious-cycles-on-mNEC5v8ycW

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by ACM Inc.
ISSN
1542-7730
DOI
10.1145/1080862.1080870
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Kode Vicious Cycles On kode vicious A koder with attitude, KV ANSWERS Not only does California give you plenty of MISS MANNERS HE AIN ™T. sun, it also apparently has employers that give you plenty of time to play around with the œsmaller problems  that you like, in a programming language that ™s irrelevant to the later implementation. It may be convenient, but it ™s actually very dangerous to solve your favorite problem rst and then add the dif cult, not-liked stuff later. Examples: Security ”can it be added later? No! Read the pleas of guilty in œPatching the Enterprise  by George Brandman (ACM Queue, March 2005: 32-39)! Performance ”can it be added later? No! Look into the faces of all the frustrated software reengineers. Even more frustrating than the lack of sunshine in my country is the absence of employers that give you time to play around with scripting languages when project deadlines impend and budgets are already overspent. We are forced to make good overall designs rst and then improve them iteratively. Oh, California ”the land of milk and honey and bicycling in the sun! YOUR QUESTIONS. S ummer has descended upon us, in

Journal

QueueAssociation for Computing Machinery

Published: Jul 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.