One weakness of DiffServ is the lack of granularity for QoS guaranteed services, which makes it difficult to cost-effectively support end-to-end (e2e) QoS according to the e2e situation (e.g., path lengths) of applications. With the conventional packet-level QoS mechanisms for the regulated traffic, i.e., buffer admission control plus output schedulers in general, increasing service granularity may inevitably complicate implementation and/or impact scalability since sophisticated output schedulers seem necessary in this case. In this paper, a new structure, Differentiated Queueing Services (DQS), is discussed to handle the above issue. DQS tries to provide granular and scalable QoS guaranteed services to be selected by users according to their QoS requirements and e2e situation. Its basic idea is to convert packet delay guarantee into packet loss ratio guarantee with either dropping or marking the packets whose e2e delays are perceived unable to be guaranteed. Packets are queued according to their e2e delay requirements so that various delay bounds can be guaranteed without using sophisticated output schedulers while different packet loss ratios are mainly controlled by call admission control (CAC). To this end, the e2e QoS requirement is carried by each packet to avoid storing such information in network units for scalability. On the other hand, differentiated services should also be accomplished with a differentiated cost model for pricing, not only for the profits of both the service provider and the user, but also to prevent good services from being abused. So, a cost model for differentiated QoS services provided by DQS is also discussed with a possible CAC based on the exponentially bounded burstiness traffic.
End of preview. The entire article is 10 pages. To view the full-text, please rent this article to continue.
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/granular-differentiated-queueing-services-for-qos-structure-and-cost-vcUKJsMO5C
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%
Granular differentiated queueing services for QoS: structure and cost model
Jiang, Shengming
Follow ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
, Volume 35 (2)
Association for Computing Machinery – Apr 1, 2005
More Info
More Like This Article
View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct
© 2012 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
