Eth1c5 1n the De519n 0f Human-C0mputer 1nterface5 f0r the D15a61ed Ume5h7hakkar 1n5truct10na1De519nand 7echn0109y C011e9e0f Educat10n 0h10 5tate Un1ver51ty C01um6u5,0H 43210 1ntr0duct10n 8aecker ¢ 8uxt0n (1987) have def1ned human-c0mputer 1nteract10n5 a5 ¢ ¢the 5et 0f pr0ce55e5, d1a109ue5, and act10n5 thr0u9h wh1ch a human u5er emp10y5 and 1nteract5 w1th a c0mputer. ¢ ¢ 7he 90a1 15 51mp1yt0 1mpr0ve the 4ua11ty 0f 1nteract10n5 6etween the human u5er and the c0mputer. 0 n e pr061em w1th th15 90a115 that we tend t0 f0r9et a60ut the d15a61ed p0pu1at10n when enhanc1n9 the 4ua11ty 0f human-c0mputer 1nteract10n5. What c0mputer5 are, h0w are they u5ed, and wh0 u5e5 them 5h0u1d 6e 5u6ject t0 a carefu1 de519n. 7echn01091ca1 1nn0vat10n5 1n c0mput1n9 are creat1n9 a hu9e 1mpact 0n 0ur 50c1ety. 7he5e 1nn0vat10n5 are 0pen1n9 new w1nd0w5 0f 0pp0rtun1t1e5 f0r the phy51ca11yd15a61ed u5er5. Yet, even w1th the5e techn01091ca1 6reakthr0u9h5, hand1capped c0mputer u5er5 face 5er10u5 065tac1e5. 0 n e rea50n f0r th15 pr061em 15 0ur 50c1ety~5 1ack 0f attent10n a60ut the hand1capped u5er5 ¢ need5. 7h15 6r1n95 u5 t0 the 155ue 0f eth1c5 f0r the human-c0mputer 1nterface de519ner5. ¢ ¢C0mputer eth1c5, ¢ ¢ a5 pr0p05ed 6y M00r (1985), ¢1 the ana1y515 0f the 5 nature and 50c1a11mpact 0f c0mputer techn0109y
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/ethics-in-the-design-of-human-computer-interfaces-for-the-disabled-cHYZtHfmfS