Knowing the distribution of the sizes of traffic flows passing through a network link helps a network operator to characterize network resource usage, infer traffic demands, detect traffic anomalies, and accommodate new traffic demands through better traffic engineering. Previous work on estimating the flow size distribution has been focused on making inferences from sampled network traffic. Its accuracy is limited by the (typically) low sampling rate required to make the sampling operation affordable. In this paper we present a novel data streaming algorithm to provide much more accurate estimates of flow distribution, using a "lossy data structure" which consists of an array of counters fitted well into SRAM. For each incoming packet, our algorithm only needs to increment one underlying counter, making the algorithm fast enough even for 40 Gbps (OC-768) links. The data structure is lossy in the sense that sizes of multiple flows may collide into the same counter. Our algorithm uses Bayesian statistical methods such as Expectation Maximization to infer the most likely flow size distribution that results in the observed counter values after collision. Evaluations of this algorithm on large Internet traces obtained from several sources (including a tier-1 ISP) demonstrate that it has very high measurement accuracy (within 2%). Our algorithm not only dramatically improves the accuracy of flow distribution measurement, but also contributes to the field of data streaming by formalizing an existing methodology and applying it to the context of estimating the flow-distribution.
End of preview. The entire article is 12 pages. To view the full-text, please rent this article to continue.
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/data-streaming-algorithms-for-efficient-and-accurate-estimation-of-KDsvBsysj0
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%
Data streaming algorithms for efficient and accurate estimation of flow size distribution
Kumar, Abhishek; Sung, Minho; Xu, Jun (Jim); Wang, Jia
Follow ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
, Volume 32 (1)
Association for Computing Machinery – Jun 1, 2004
More Info
More Like This Article
View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct
© 2012 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
