Historically, processor accesses to memory-mapped device registers have been marked uncachable to insure their visibility to the device. The ubiquity of snooping cache coherence, however, makes it possible for processors and devices to interact with cachable, coherent memory operations. Using coherence can improve performance by facilitating burst transfers of whole cache blocks and reducing control overheads (e.g., for polling).This paper begins an exploration of network interfaces (NIs) that use coherence---coherent network interfaces (CNIs)---to improve communication performance. We restrict this study to NI/CNIs that reside on coherent memory or I/O buses, to NI/CNIs that are much simpler than processors, and to the performance of fine-grain messaging from user process to user process.Our first contribution is to develop and optimize two mechanisms that CNIs use to communicate with processors. A cachable device register---derived from cachable control registers 39,40---is a coherent, cachable block of memory used to transfer status, control, or data between a device and a processor. Cachable queues generalize cachable device registers from one cachable, coherent memory block to a contiguous region of cachable, coherent blocks managed as a circular queue.Our second contribution is a taxonomy and comparison of four CNIs with a more conventional NI. Microbenchmark results show that CNIs can improve the round-trip latency and achievable bandwidth of a small 64-byte message by 37% and 125% respectively on the memory bus and 74% and 123% respectively on a coherent I/O bus. Experiments with five macrobenchmarks show that CNIs can improve the performance by 17-53% on the memory bus and 30-88% on the I/O bus.
End of preview. The entire article is 12 pages. To view the full-text, please rent this article to continue.
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/coherent-network-interfaces-for-fine-grain-communication-td3eLDeUrB
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%
Coherent network interfaces for fine-grain communication
Mukherjee, Shubhendu S.; Falsafi, Babak; Hill, Mark D.; Wood, David A.
Follow ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News
, Volume 24 (2)
Association for Computing Machinery – May 1, 1996
More Info
More Like This Article
View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct
© 2012 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
