Dynamic software cache coherence strategies use information about program sharing behaviour to manage caches at run-time and at a granularity defined by the application. The program-level information is obtained through annotations placed into the application by the user or the compiler. The coherence protocols may range from simple static algorithms to dynamic algorithms that use run-time data structures similar to the directories used in hardware strategies. In this paper, we present an analytic study of five dynamic software cache coherence algorithms and compare these to a representative hardware coherence strategy. The analytic model is constructed using four input parameters --- write probability, locality, granularity, and system size --- and solved by analysis of a Markov chain. We show that the fundamental tradeoffs between the different hardware and software strategies are captured in this model. The results of the study show that hardware schemes perform better for fine-grained data structures for much of the parameter space that we study. However, for coarse-grained data structures, various software algorithms are dominant over most of the parameter space. Further, hardware strategies are found to be more susceptible to the effects of contention, and also perform worse for the asymmetric workload that we study.
End of preview. The entire article is 11 pages. To view the full-text, please rent this article to continue.
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/an-analytic-study-of-dynamic-hardware-and-software-cache-coherence-ZAxdbYlFf3
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%
An analytic study of dynamic hardware and software cache coherence strategies
Sandhu, Harjinder S.; Sevcik, Kenneth C.
Follow ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
, Volume 23 (1)
Association for Computing Machinery – May 1, 1995
More Info
More Like This Article
View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct
© 2012 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
