Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

M ECHANISMS IN P OLITICAL P ROCESSES

M ECHANISMS IN P OLITICAL P ROCESSES ▪ Abstract Ostensibly theoretical disputes in political science often involve competing approaches to explanation, including skepticism, covering law arguments, reconstructions of propensities, system models, and explanations featuring causal mechanisms. Mechanism- and process-based accounts, including cognitive, environmental, and relational effects, deserve more attention than they have received in recent political science. Analyses of democratization illustrate these points. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annual Review of Political Science Annual Reviews

M ECHANISMS IN P OLITICAL P ROCESSES

Annual Review of Political Science , Volume 4 (1) – Jun 1, 2001

Loading next page...
 
/lp/annual-reviews/m-echanisms-in-p-olitical-p-rocesses-1goqk25Lit

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Annual Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
Subject
Review Articles
ISSN
1094-2939
eISSN
1545-1577
DOI
10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.21
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

▪ Abstract Ostensibly theoretical disputes in political science often involve competing approaches to explanation, including skepticism, covering law arguments, reconstructions of propensities, system models, and explanations featuring causal mechanisms. Mechanism- and process-based accounts, including cognitive, environmental, and relational effects, deserve more attention than they have received in recent political science. Analyses of democratization illustrate these points.

Journal

Annual Review of Political ScienceAnnual Reviews

Published: Jun 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.