Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Use of a Two-Color Genetic Screen To Identify a Domain of the Global Regulator Lrp That Is Specifically Required forpap Phase Variation

Use of a Two-Color Genetic Screen To Identify a Domain of the Global Regulator Lrp That Is... Use of a Two-Color Genetic Screen To Identify a Domain of the Global Regulator Lrp That Is Specifically Required for pap Phase Variation Linda Kaltenbach , Bruce Braaten , Julie Tucker , Margareta Krabbe and David Low * Division of Cell Biology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132 ABSTRACT The global regulator Lrp plays a central role as both a repressor and an activator in Pap phase variation. Unlike most other members of the Lrp regulon such as ilvIH , activation of papBA transcription requires the coregulator PapI and is methylation dependent. We developed a two-color genetic screen to identify Lrp mutations that inhibit Pap phase variation but still activate ilvIH transcription, reasoning that such mutations might identify PapI binding or methylation-responsive domains. Amino acid substitutions in Lrp at position 126, 133, or 134 greatly reduced the rate of Pap switching from phase off to phase on but had much smaller effects on ilvIH transcription. In vitro analyses indicated that the T134A and E133G Lrp variants maintained affinities for pap and ilvIH DNAs similar to those of wild-type Lrp. In addition, both mutant Lrp’s were as responsive to PapI as wild-type Lrp, evidenced by an increase in affinity for pap Lrp binding sites 4, 5, and 6. Thus, in vitro analyses did not reveal the step(s) in Pap phase variation where these Lrp mutants were inhibited. In vivo analyses showed that both the T134A and E133G Lrp mutants activated transcription of a phase-on-locked pap derivative containing a mutation in Lrp binding site 3. Further studies indicated that the T134A Lrp mutant was blocked in a step in Pap phase variation that does not involve PapI. Our data suggest that these mutant Lrp’s are defective in a previously unidentified interaction required for the switch from the phase-off to the phase-on pap transcription state. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Bacteriology American Society For Microbiology

Use of a Two-Color Genetic Screen To Identify a Domain of the Global Regulator Lrp That Is Specifically Required forpap Phase Variation

Use of a Two-Color Genetic Screen To Identify a Domain of the Global Regulator Lrp That Is Specifically Required forpap Phase Variation

Journal of Bacteriology , Volume 180 (5): 1224 – Mar 1, 1998

Abstract

Use of a Two-Color Genetic Screen To Identify a Domain of the Global Regulator Lrp That Is Specifically Required for pap Phase Variation Linda Kaltenbach , Bruce Braaten , Julie Tucker , Margareta Krabbe and David Low * Division of Cell Biology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132 ABSTRACT The global regulator Lrp plays a central role as both a repressor and an activator in Pap phase variation. Unlike most other members of the Lrp regulon such as ilvIH , activation of papBA transcription requires the coregulator PapI and is methylation dependent. We developed a two-color genetic screen to identify Lrp mutations that inhibit Pap phase variation but still activate ilvIH transcription, reasoning that such mutations might identify PapI binding or methylation-responsive domains. Amino acid substitutions in Lrp at position 126, 133, or 134 greatly reduced the rate of Pap switching from phase off to phase on but had much smaller effects on ilvIH transcription. In vitro analyses indicated that the T134A and E133G Lrp variants maintained affinities for pap and ilvIH DNAs similar to those of wild-type Lrp. In addition, both mutant Lrp’s were as responsive to PapI as wild-type Lrp, evidenced by an increase in affinity for pap Lrp binding sites 4, 5, and 6. Thus, in vitro analyses did not reveal the step(s) in Pap phase variation where these Lrp mutants were inhibited. In vivo analyses showed that both the T134A and E133G Lrp mutants activated transcription of a phase-on-locked pap derivative containing a mutation in Lrp binding site 3. Further studies indicated that the T134A Lrp mutant was blocked in a step in Pap phase variation that does not involve PapI. Our data suggest that these mutant Lrp’s are defective in a previously unidentified interaction required for the switch from the phase-off to the phase-on pap transcription state.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-society-for-microbiology/use-of-a-two-color-genetic-screen-to-identify-a-domain-of-the-global-haGX3Hp88L

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Society For Microbiology
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the American society for Microbiology.
ISSN
0021-9193
eISSN
1098-5530
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Use of a Two-Color Genetic Screen To Identify a Domain of the Global Regulator Lrp That Is Specifically Required for pap Phase Variation Linda Kaltenbach , Bruce Braaten , Julie Tucker , Margareta Krabbe and David Low * Division of Cell Biology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132 ABSTRACT The global regulator Lrp plays a central role as both a repressor and an activator in Pap phase variation. Unlike most other members of the Lrp regulon such as ilvIH , activation of papBA transcription requires the coregulator PapI and is methylation dependent. We developed a two-color genetic screen to identify Lrp mutations that inhibit Pap phase variation but still activate ilvIH transcription, reasoning that such mutations might identify PapI binding or methylation-responsive domains. Amino acid substitutions in Lrp at position 126, 133, or 134 greatly reduced the rate of Pap switching from phase off to phase on but had much smaller effects on ilvIH transcription. In vitro analyses indicated that the T134A and E133G Lrp variants maintained affinities for pap and ilvIH DNAs similar to those of wild-type Lrp. In addition, both mutant Lrp’s were as responsive to PapI as wild-type Lrp, evidenced by an increase in affinity for pap Lrp binding sites 4, 5, and 6. Thus, in vitro analyses did not reveal the step(s) in Pap phase variation where these Lrp mutants were inhibited. In vivo analyses showed that both the T134A and E133G Lrp mutants activated transcription of a phase-on-locked pap derivative containing a mutation in Lrp binding site 3. Further studies indicated that the T134A Lrp mutant was blocked in a step in Pap phase variation that does not involve PapI. Our data suggest that these mutant Lrp’s are defective in a previously unidentified interaction required for the switch from the phase-off to the phase-on pap transcription state.

Journal

Journal of BacteriologyAmerican Society For Microbiology

Published: Mar 1, 1998

There are no references for this article.