Abstract

Receive: RSS Feeds, eTOCs, free email alerts (when new articles cite this article), more» Information about commercial reprint orders: http://jcm.asm.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml To subscribe to to another ASM Journal go to: http://journals.asm.org/site/subscriptions/ Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on December 13, 2011 by deepdyve ERRATUM WILLIAM J. BUESCHING, DWANE L. RHODEN, ANN 0. ESAIAS, PETER B. SMITH, AND JOHN A. WASHINGTON II Section of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55901, and Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Volume 10, no. 4. The number of correct identifications among unusual and atypical organisms "revised" (i.e., excluding Citrobacter amalonaticus, Enterobacter gergoviae, and Pectobacterium) should be 123 (84.2%), rather than 138 (94.5%) as stated on p. 454, line 10 of the Abstract; p. 455, column 1, lines 15-16 of Results; p. 455, Table 1; p. 456, column 1, line 3 of Results; and p. 456, Table 3. The total number of correct identifications should, therefore, be 265 (91.1%), rather than 280 (96.2%) as stated on p. 455, column 2, line 2 of Results and on p. 455, Table 1.