Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Effects of Different Tuberculin Skin-Testing Regimens on Gamma Interferon and Antibody Responses in Cattle Experimentally Infected with Mycobacterium bovis

Effects of Different Tuberculin Skin-Testing Regimens on Gamma Interferon and Antibody Responses... Effects of Different Tuberculin Skin-Testing Regimens on Gamma Interferon and Antibody Responses in Cattle Experimentally Infected with Mycobacterium bovis M. V. Palmer 1 , * , W. R. Waters 1 , T. C. Thacker 1 , R. Greenwald 2 , J. Esfandiari 2 , and K. P. Lyashchenko 2 1 United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa 2 Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Medford, New York ABSTRACT Although tuberculin skin testing has been a hallmark of bovine tuberculosis eradication campaigns, it lacks sensitivity, can be confounded by exposure to nontuberculous mycobacteria, and cannot be repeated for 60 days due to desensitization. To overcome these difficulties, an effective whole-blood cellular immunoassay for bovine gamma interferon (IFN-γ) has been developed. The IFN-γ test is commonly used in conjunction with tuberculin skin testing as a confirmatory test following a positive response to the caudal fold test (CFT). The present study was conducted to determine the effect of different tuberculin skin-testing regimens on IFN-γ and antibody production by using calves that were experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis . Holstein calves were CFT tested 60 days after inoculation and the comparative cervical test (CCT) was conducted 7 (7-day CCT) or 55 (55-day CCT) days after the CFT. In both the 7-day CCT and 55-day CCT groups, IFN-γ responses increased 3 days after the CFT; this was immediately followed by a decrease to pre-skin test levels 7 days after the CFT. In both groups, the application of the CCT at 7 or 55 days after the CFT resulted in no significant increase in IFN-γ production. The administration of the CFT and the CCT to M. bovis -inoculated cattle boosted antibody responses to M. bovis PPD, rMPB83, ESAT-6, and the fusion protein Acr1-MPB83. The boosting effect was more pronounced in the 55-day CCT group. Increases in either IFN-γ or antibody production were not seen in noninoculated cattle. Measurement of both IFN-γ and antibody responses after skin testing may be useful in identifying M. bovis -infected cattle; however, the timing of collection of such samples may influence interpretation. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical and Vaccine Immunology American Society For Microbiology

Effects of Different Tuberculin Skin-Testing Regimens on Gamma Interferon and Antibody Responses in Cattle Experimentally Infected with Mycobacterium bovis

Effects of Different Tuberculin Skin-Testing Regimens on Gamma Interferon and Antibody Responses in Cattle Experimentally Infected with Mycobacterium bovis

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology , Volume 13 (3): 387 – Mar 1, 2006

Abstract

Effects of Different Tuberculin Skin-Testing Regimens on Gamma Interferon and Antibody Responses in Cattle Experimentally Infected with Mycobacterium bovis M. V. Palmer 1 , * , W. R. Waters 1 , T. C. Thacker 1 , R. Greenwald 2 , J. Esfandiari 2 , and K. P. Lyashchenko 2 1 United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa 2 Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Medford, New York ABSTRACT Although tuberculin skin testing has been a hallmark of bovine tuberculosis eradication campaigns, it lacks sensitivity, can be confounded by exposure to nontuberculous mycobacteria, and cannot be repeated for 60 days due to desensitization. To overcome these difficulties, an effective whole-blood cellular immunoassay for bovine gamma interferon (IFN-γ) has been developed. The IFN-γ test is commonly used in conjunction with tuberculin skin testing as a confirmatory test following a positive response to the caudal fold test (CFT). The present study was conducted to determine the effect of different tuberculin skin-testing regimens on IFN-γ and antibody production by using calves that were experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis . Holstein calves were CFT tested 60 days after inoculation and the comparative cervical test (CCT) was conducted 7 (7-day CCT) or 55 (55-day CCT) days after the CFT. In both the 7-day CCT and 55-day CCT groups, IFN-γ responses increased 3 days after the CFT; this was immediately followed by a decrease to pre-skin test levels 7 days after the CFT. In both groups, the application of the CCT at 7 or 55 days after the CFT resulted in no significant increase in IFN-γ production. The administration of the CFT and the CCT to M. bovis -inoculated cattle boosted antibody responses to M. bovis PPD, rMPB83, ESAT-6, and the fusion protein Acr1-MPB83. The boosting effect was more pronounced in the 55-day CCT group. Increases in either IFN-γ or antibody production were not seen in noninoculated cattle. Measurement of both IFN-γ and antibody responses after skin testing may be useful in identifying M. bovis -infected cattle; however, the timing of collection of such samples may influence interpretation.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-society-for-microbiology/effects-of-different-tuberculin-skin-testing-regimens-on-gamma-a3XvVUgxwC

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Society For Microbiology
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by the American society for Microbiology.
ISSN
1556-6811
eISSN
1556-679X
DOI
10.1128/CVI.13.3.387-394.2006
pmid
16522782
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Effects of Different Tuberculin Skin-Testing Regimens on Gamma Interferon and Antibody Responses in Cattle Experimentally Infected with Mycobacterium bovis M. V. Palmer 1 , * , W. R. Waters 1 , T. C. Thacker 1 , R. Greenwald 2 , J. Esfandiari 2 , and K. P. Lyashchenko 2 1 United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa 2 Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Medford, New York ABSTRACT Although tuberculin skin testing has been a hallmark of bovine tuberculosis eradication campaigns, it lacks sensitivity, can be confounded by exposure to nontuberculous mycobacteria, and cannot be repeated for 60 days due to desensitization. To overcome these difficulties, an effective whole-blood cellular immunoassay for bovine gamma interferon (IFN-γ) has been developed. The IFN-γ test is commonly used in conjunction with tuberculin skin testing as a confirmatory test following a positive response to the caudal fold test (CFT). The present study was conducted to determine the effect of different tuberculin skin-testing regimens on IFN-γ and antibody production by using calves that were experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis . Holstein calves were CFT tested 60 days after inoculation and the comparative cervical test (CCT) was conducted 7 (7-day CCT) or 55 (55-day CCT) days after the CFT. In both the 7-day CCT and 55-day CCT groups, IFN-γ responses increased 3 days after the CFT; this was immediately followed by a decrease to pre-skin test levels 7 days after the CFT. In both groups, the application of the CCT at 7 or 55 days after the CFT resulted in no significant increase in IFN-γ production. The administration of the CFT and the CCT to M. bovis -inoculated cattle boosted antibody responses to M. bovis PPD, rMPB83, ESAT-6, and the fusion protein Acr1-MPB83. The boosting effect was more pronounced in the 55-day CCT group. Increases in either IFN-γ or antibody production were not seen in noninoculated cattle. Measurement of both IFN-γ and antibody responses after skin testing may be useful in identifying M. bovis -infected cattle; however, the timing of collection of such samples may influence interpretation.

Journal

Clinical and Vaccine ImmunologyAmerican Society For Microbiology

Published: Mar 1, 2006

There are no references for this article.