Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Sanchez-Ramos, A. Kaunitz, H. Peterson, B. Martinez-Schnell, R. Thompson (1990)
Reducing cesarean sections at a teaching hospital.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 163 3
G. Goyert, S. Bottoms, M. Treadwell, P. Nehra (1989)
The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.The New England journal of medicine, 320 11
Rosenblatt Ra (1987)
Perinatal outcomes and family medicine: refocusing the research agenda.Journal of Family Practice, 24
Mary Knedle-Murray, D. Oakley, J. Wheeler, B. Petersen (1993)
Production Process Substitution in Maternity Care: Issues of Cost, Quality, and Outcomes by Nurse-Midwives and Physician ProvidersMedical Care Review, 50
M. Wagner (1991)
Maternal and Child Health Services in the United StatesJournal of Public Health Policy, 12
E. Keeler, Mollyann Brodie (1993)
Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.The Milbank quarterly, 71 3
M. Deutchman, DeAnna Sills, P. Connor (1995)
Perinatal Outcomes: A Comparison Between Family Physicians And ObstetriciansThe Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 8
S Zahniser, J Kendrick, A Franks, A Saftlas (1992)
Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987.American journal of public health, 82 10
L. Burns, S. Geller, D. Wholey (1995)
The Effect of Physician Factors on the Cesarean Section DecisionMedical Care, 33
Gerhardstein Lp, Allswede Mt, Sloan Ct, Lorenz Rp (1995)
Reduction in the rate of cesarean birth with active management of labor and intermediate-dose oxytocin.Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 40
A. Reid, J. Carroll, J. Ruderman, M. Murray (1989)
Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 140 6
William Hueston, M. Rudy (1993)
A comparison of labor and delivery management between nurse midwives and family physicians.The Journal of family practice, 37 5
Cornelia Daly, A. Medearis, L. Chambliss, M. Ames, Martha Kayne, R. Paul (1992)
The Role of Selection Bias in Comparing Cesarean Birth Rates Between Physician and Midwifery ManagementObstetrics & Gynecology, 80
Gérard Bréart, N. Mlika-Cabane, Monique Kaminski, S. Alexander, A. Herruzo-Nald, P. Mandruzzato, Jim Thornton, D. Trakas (1992)
Evaluation of different policies for the management of labour.Early human development, 29 1-3
Julie Guillemette, WILLIAM Eraser (1992)
Differences between obstetricians in caesarean section rates and the management of labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 99
Jennifer Haas, Steven Udvarhelyi, Arnold Epstein (1993)
The effect of health coverage for uninsured pregnant women on maternal health and the use of cesarean section.JAMA, 270 1
J. López-Zeno, A. Peaceman, Joseph Adashek, M. Socol (1992)
A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor.The New England journal of medicine, 326 7
A. Tussing, M. Wojtowycz (1994)
Health maintenance organizations, independent practice associations, and cesarean section rates.Health services research, 29 1
S. Myers, N. Gleicher (1993)
The Mount Sinai cesarean section reduction program: an update after 6 years.Social science & medicine, 37 10
S. Tay, F. Tsakok, C. Ng (1992)
The use of intradepartmental audit to contain cesarean section rateInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 39
J. Gould, B. Davey, R. Stafford (1989)
Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.The New England journal of medicine, 322 4
G. Anderson, J. Lomas (1984)
Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.The New England journal of medicine, 311 14
Edward Sekscenski, Stephanie Sansom, Carol Bazell, Marla Salmon, Fitzhugh Mullan (1994)
State practice environments and the supply of physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse-midwives.The New England journal of medicine, 331 19
Richard Paul, David Miller (1995)
Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 172 6
I. Rutkow (1986)
Obstetric and gynecologic operations in the United States, 1979 to 1984.Obstetrics and gynecology, 67 6
R. Stafford (1990)
Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.American journal of public health, 80 3
E Graveley, J Littlefield (1992)
A cost-effectiveness analysis of three staffing models for the delivery of low-risk prenatal care.American journal of public health, 82 2
S. Taffel, P. Placek, M. Moien (1989)
Cesarean section rate levels off in 1987.Family planning perspectives, 21 5
L. Albers, D. Savitz (1991)
Hospital setting for birth and use of medical procedures in low-risk women.Journal of nurse-midwifery, 36 6
E. Feldman, M. Hurst (1987)
Outcomes and procedures in low risk birth: a comparison of hospital and birth center settings.Birth, 14 1
S. Schroeder (1987)
Strategies for Reducing Medical Costs by Changing Physicians' Behavior: Efficacy and Impact on Quality of CareInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 3
K. Parrish, Victoria Holt, Thomas Easterling, Frederick Connell, James LoGerfo (1994)
Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates.JAMA, 271 6
L. McKenzie, P. Stephenson (1993)
Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.American journal of public health, 83 8
S. MacDonald, K. Voaklander, R. Birtwhistle (1993)
A comparison of family physicians' and obstetricians' intrapartum management of low-risk pregnancies.The Journal of family practice, 37 5
F. Mayes, D. Oakley, B. Wranesh, N. Springer, J. Krumlauf, R. Crosby (1987)
A retrospective comparison of certified nurse-midwife and physician management of low risk births. A pilot study.Journal of nurse-midwifery, 32 4
G. Anderson, J. Lomas (1985)
Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies?Canadian Medical Association journal, 132 3
S. Myers, N. Gleicher (1988)
A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.The New England journal of medicine, 319 23
R. Stafford (1990)
Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section ratesJAMA, 263
C. Sakala (1993)
Midwifery care and out-of-hospital birth settings: how do they reduce unnecessary cesarean section births?Social science & medicine, 37 10
Samuel Soliman, R. Burrows (1993)
Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 148 8
Taffel Sm (1989)
Cesarean section in America: dramatic trends, 1970 to 1987., 70
M. Reid, J. Morris (1979)
Perinatal Care and Cost Effectiveness: Changes in Health Expenditures and Birth Outcome Following the Establishment of a Nurse–Midwife ProgramMedical Care, 17
P. Braveman, S. Egerter, F. Edmonston, M. Verdon (1995)
Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California.American journal of public health, 85 5
L. McCloskey, D. Petitti, C. Hobel (1992)
Variations in the Use of Cesarean Delivery for Dystocia: Lessons About the Source of CareMedical Care, 30
LAURA-MAE Win, T. Raine, L. Jenkins, L. Hart, R. Rosenblatt (1994)
Do Providers Adhere to ACOG Standards? The Case of Prenatal CareObstetrics & Gynecology, 84
P. Eskew, R. Saywell, T. Zollinger, B. Erner, T. Oser (1994)
Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.The Journal of reproductive medicine, 39 10
E. Declercq (1992)
The transformation of American midwifery: 1975 to 1988.American journal of public health, 82 5
Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women. R A Rosenblatt , S A Dobie , L G Hart , R Schneeweiss , D Gould , T R Raine , T J Benedetti , M J Pirani and E B Perrin Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98195-4795, USA. OBJECTIVES: This study examined differences among obstetricians, family physicians, and certified nurse-midwives in the patterns of obstetric care provided to low-risk patients. METHODS: For a random sample of Washington State obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians, and certified nurse-midwives, records of a random sample of their low-risk patients beginning care between September 1, 1988, and August 31, 1989, were abstracted. RESULTS: Certified nurse-midwives were less likely to use continuous electronic fetal monitoring and had lower rates of labor induction or augmentation than physicians. Certified nurse-midwives also were less likely than physicians to use epidural anesthesia. The cesarean section rate for patients of certified nurse-midwives was 8.8% vs 13.6% for obstetricians and 15.1% for family physicians. Certified nurse-midwives used 12.2% fewer resources. There was little difference between the practice patterns of obstetricians and family physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The low-risk patients of certified nurse-midwives in Washington State received fewer obstetrical interventions than similar patients cared for by obstetrician-gynecologists or family physicians. These differences are associated with lower cesarean section rates and less resource use.
American Journal of Public Health – American Public Health Association
Published: Mar 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.