Abstract
David Bienenfeld M.D. 1 , Ronald Markert Ph.D. 2 , John Rudisill Ph.D. 1 , Paulette Gillig M.D., Ph.D. 1 , James A. Bourgeois M.D. 1 , William Klykylo M.D. 1 , Brenda Roman M.D. 1 , Barbara Warner M.D. 1 , and Jerald Kay M.D. 1 1 Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University School of Medicine 2 Department of Medicine, Wright State University School of Medicine A questionnaire was sent to chairs and faculty in 137 academic departments of psychiatry regarding the methods used to promote teaching and their perceived value. The incentives most often used included promotion and retention, nomination to committees, and peer recognition. Least often used were bonuses and a designated teachers' career track. Chairs and their faculty often disagreed as to whether some incentives were being used at all. Recognition of teaching excellence was generally most highly valued as a useful incentive. Clarification of the nature and purpose of teaching incentives would likely improve their effectiveness. Note: The opinion expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official views of the Department of the Air Force, the Department of the Defense, or other federal agencies.If you're having problem loading pages
Try our single-page mode to load one page at a time


Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.
Preview Only
© 2012 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy