Search

Filter

  • Advanced Filters:

  • to

  • Specific Data Sources:

    All Edit

    Select All  |  Select None

Reset filters

Journals Academic Psychiatry Volume 28 Issue 2

Objective : The construct validity of checklist and global process scores for an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in psychiatry was assessed. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict psychiatry OSCE scores from the clinical skills examination, an obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN) OSCE, and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) psychiatry subject examination. Methods : Archival data from two successive classes of third-year medical students (1999–2000, N=142; 2000–2001, N=144) were aggregated and analyzed. Results : The pattern and magnitude of convergence and discrimination were indicative of adequate construct validity for both the psychiatry checklist scores and the global process score. Clinical skills examination scores for history taking, interpersonal skills, and physical examination were related to psychiatry OSCE scores that reflected the same skill set. Construct validity was fairly higher for the global process rating. Conclusion : Evidence of construct validity of a psychiatry OSCE was obtained from multiple measures of performance, including the clinical skills examination. Findings lend support to the continued use of checklist and global process evaluations as part of OSCEs in psychiatry.

Construct Validity of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Psychiatry: Associations With the Clinical Skills Examination and Other Indicators

Abstract

Objective : The construct validity of checklist and global process scores for an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in psychiatry was assessed. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict psychiatry OSCE scores from the clinical skills examination, an obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN) OSCE, and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) psychiatry subject examination. Methods : Archival data from two successive classes of third-year medical students (1999–2000, N=142; 2000–2001, N=144) were aggregated and analyzed. Results : The pattern and magnitude of convergence and discrimination were indicative of adequate construct validity for both the psychiatry checklist scores and the global process score. Clinical skills examination scores for history taking, interpersonal skills, and physical examination were related to psychiatry OSCE scores that reflected the same skill set. Construct validity was fairly higher for the global process rating. Conclusion : Evidence of construct validity of a psychiatry OSCE was obtained from multiple measures of performance, including the clinical skills examination. Findings lend support to the continued use of checklist and global process evaluations as part of OSCEs in psychiatry.
Loading next page...

If you're having problem loading pages
Try our single-page mode to load one page at a time

Preview Only. This article cannot be rented because we do not currently have permission from the publisher.

/lp/american-psychiatric-publishing-inc-journal/construct-validity-of-an-objective-structured-clinical-examination-LDrT6ATRti
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%

Learn more

Preview Only

Bookmark

Construct Validity of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Psychiatry: Associations With the Clinical Skills Examination and Other Indicators

Park, Robin S.; Chibnall, John T.; Blaskiewicz, Robert J.; Furman, Gail E.; Powell, Jill K.; Mohr, Clinton J.
Academic Psychiatry , Volume 28 (2): 122
American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc (Journal) – Jun 1, 2004

More Info
  • Publisher AADPRT
  • Copyright Copyright © 2004 Academic Psychiatry. All rights reserved.
  • ISSN 1042-9670
  • D.O.I. 10.1176/appi.ap.28.2.122
  • Publisher site Get PDF  

More Like This Article

View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct

Browse: Subject Areas | Journals | Publishers

Sign Up for a DeepDyve Account

Bookmark an Article

To bookmark an article, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don't already have one.

OK

Subscribe to Journal Email Alerts

To subscribe to email alerts, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don't already have one.

OK

Thank you for renting with DeepDyve

Your PayPal account has been charged $. You now have access to the full text of this article. A rental receipt has also been sent to your email address.

Your credit card has been charged $. You now have access to the full text of this article. A rental receipt has also been sent to your email address.

OK

New! You can now keep track of new articles from Academic Psychiatry on your personalized homepage! Learn more

PDF Download — Not Available

Thanks for your interest in purchasing the PDF. Your request has been noted and we will work with our publisher partner to discuss enabling this feature.

In the meantime, you can get the PDF by visiting the publisher site.

Thank you for purchasing with DeepDyve

Your PayPal account has been charged $.

Your credit card has been charged $.

You can now download this article. A purchase receipt has also been sent to your email address.

Download This Article or I'm done with my download

Print Page — Not Available

Thanks for your interest in printing individual pages. Your request has been noted and we will work with our publisher partner to discuss enabling this feature.

In the meantime, you can get the PDF by visiting the publisher site.

Thank you for printing with DeepDyve

Your PayPal account has been charged $0.

Your credit card has been charged $0.

You can now print this article. A purchase receipt has also been sent to your email address.

Print the Selected Pages or I'm done with my printing

Please refresh to generate a new download link

Your article download link has expired. Please refresh this page to obtain a new download link and try again.

Follow a Journal

To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don't already have one.

OK