Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

CLINICAL AND THEORETICAL OBSERVATIONS ON PHENELZINE, (NARDIL), AN ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT

CLINICAL AND THEORETICAL OBSERVATIONS ON PHENELZINE, (NARDIL), AN ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT to pin prick neurological treatedor other stimuli. findings were with Aspirin,nega-I.M.sodium amytal, and I.V. fluids. She was also covered with a wet sheet upon which 2 fans were directed. In 4 hours the temperature came down to 100.5#{176}F., the convulsions stopped and patient started to respond. After 12 hours her temperature was down to 99#{176} her pupils F., were still somewhat dilated and did not react to light until 48 hours later. Laboratory studies of urinalysis and CBC, on admission and on 2 consecutive days after the reaction, were within normal limits. An EEC taken 2 days following the reaction, was normal.it is difficult to ascertain if the reaction (a) was due purely to Tofranil which, though an energizer, has a chemical structure similar to phenothiazines, (b) if it was due to synergetic action of Tofr#{227}nilsynergetically,and Nardil (monoamine oxidase inhibitor) or (c) if it was due to any idiosyncrasy on the part of the patient. Two years ago we had another patient who developed a similar reaction to a combination of Pacatal and Sparine (both phenothiazines). The case was not reported.The present case is and need being reported invarious emphasize thistranquilizers theenergizers of furtherand researchto inSince variousit is http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Psychiatry American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc (Journal)

CLINICAL AND THEORETICAL OBSERVATIONS ON PHENELZINE, (NARDIL), AN ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT

CLINICAL AND THEORETICAL OBSERVATIONS ON PHENELZINE, (NARDIL), AN ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT

American Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 117 (4): 361 – Oct 1, 1960

Abstract

to pin prick neurological treatedor other stimuli. findings were with Aspirin,nega-I.M.sodium amytal, and I.V. fluids. She was also covered with a wet sheet upon which 2 fans were directed. In 4 hours the temperature came down to 100.5#{176}F., the convulsions stopped and patient started to respond. After 12 hours her temperature was down to 99#{176} her pupils F., were still somewhat dilated and did not react to light until 48 hours later. Laboratory studies of urinalysis and CBC, on admission and on 2 consecutive days after the reaction, were within normal limits. An EEC taken 2 days following the reaction, was normal.it is difficult to ascertain if the reaction (a) was due purely to Tofranil which, though an energizer, has a chemical structure similar to phenothiazines, (b) if it was due to synergetic action of Tofr#{227}nilsynergetically,and Nardil (monoamine oxidase inhibitor) or (c) if it was due to any idiosyncrasy on the part of the patient. Two years ago we had another patient who developed a similar reaction to a combination of Pacatal and Sparine (both phenothiazines). The case was not reported.The present case is and need being reported invarious emphasize thistranquilizers theenergizers of furtherand researchto inSince variousit is

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychiatric-publishing-inc-journal/clinical-and-theoretical-observations-on-phenelzine-nardil-an-H7pAmRUDHD

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc (Journal)
Copyright
Copyright © American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved
ISSN
0002-953X
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

to pin prick neurological treatedor other stimuli. findings were with Aspirin,nega-I.M.sodium amytal, and I.V. fluids. She was also covered with a wet sheet upon which 2 fans were directed. In 4 hours the temperature came down to 100.5#{176}F., the convulsions stopped and patient started to respond. After 12 hours her temperature was down to 99#{176} her pupils F., were still somewhat dilated and did not react to light until 48 hours later. Laboratory studies of urinalysis and CBC, on admission and on 2 consecutive days after the reaction, were within normal limits. An EEC taken 2 days following the reaction, was normal.it is difficult to ascertain if the reaction (a) was due purely to Tofranil which, though an energizer, has a chemical structure similar to phenothiazines, (b) if it was due to synergetic action of Tofr#{227}nilsynergetically,and Nardil (monoamine oxidase inhibitor) or (c) if it was due to any idiosyncrasy on the part of the patient. Two years ago we had another patient who developed a similar reaction to a combination of Pacatal and Sparine (both phenothiazines). The case was not reported.The present case is and need being reported invarious emphasize thistranquilizers theenergizers of furtherand researchto inSince variousit is

Journal

American Journal of PsychiatryAmerican Psychiatric Publishing, Inc (Journal)

Published: Oct 1, 1960

There are no references for this article.