Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
We discuss the discrepancy between the Cung et al . Phys. Lett. B 68 , 474 (1977) calculation of the three-photon-annihilation contribution to the positronium ground-state energy, performed using the binding energy to regulate the infrared divergences, and the recent calculation of Adkins, Bui, and Zhu Phys. Rev. A 37 , 4071 (1988), which used a photon mass to regulate these divergences. By using a simpler version of the binding-energy approach advocated by these authors, we confirm the value of the discrepancy they obtained. Furthermore, it is shown that the additional term needed in the binding-energy approach to produce agreement between the two methods is precisely the one required to make the binding-energy regularized amplitudes gauge invariant to all orders in the binding.
Physical Review A – American Physical Society (APS)
Published: Nov 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.