Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Jacobson (2001)
Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosolsNature, 409
V. Ramanathan, P. Crutzen, J. Kiehl, D. Rosenfeld (2001)
Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological CycleScience, 294
P. Chylek, G. Lesins, U. Lohmann (2001)
Enhancement of dust source area during past glacial periods due to changes of the Hadley circulationJournal of Geophysical Research, 106
L. Barrie, Y. Yi, W. Leaitch, U. Lohmann, P. Kasibhatla, G. Roelofs, J. Wilson, F. Mcgovern, C. Benkovitz, M. Mélières, K. Law, J. Prospero, M. Kritz, D. Bergmann, C. Bridgeman, M. Chin, J. Christensen, R. Easter, J. Feichter, C. Land, A. Jeuken, E. Kjellström, D. Koch, P. Rasch (2001)
A comparison of large-scale atmospheric sulphate aerosol models (COSAM): overview and highlightsTellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 53
P. Liss, L. Merlivat (1986)
Air-Sea Gas Exchange Rates: Introduction and Synthesis
H. Douville, F. Chauvin, S. Planton, J. Royer, D. Salas-Mélia, S. Tyteca (2002)
Sensitivity of the hydrological cycle to increasing amounts of greenhouse gases and aerosolsClimate Dynamics, 20
U. Lohmann, J. Feichter, J. Penner, R. Leaitch (2000)
Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: A mechanistic treatmentJournal of Geophysical Research, 105
G. Boer (1993)
Climate change and the regulation of the surface moisture and energy budgetsClimate Dynamics, 8
L. Levkov, B. Rockel, H. Kapitza, E. Raschke (1992)
3D mesoscale numerical studies of cirrus and stratus clouds by their time and space evolutionContributions to atmospheric physics, 65
A. Guenther, C. Hewitt, D. Erickson, R. Fall, C. Geron, Tom, Graedel, P. Harley, L. Klinger, M. Lerdau, W. Mckay, T. Pierce, B. Scholes, R. Steinbrecher, R. Tallamraju, John Taylor, Pat, Zimmerman (1995)
A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissionsJournal of Geophysical Research, 100
M. Collins, C. Senior (2002)
Projections of future climate changeWeather, 57
M. Hess, P. Koepke, I. Schult (1998)
Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPACBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79
H. Grassl (1979)
Possible Changes of Planetary Albedo Due to Aerosol Particles, 10
J. Mitchell (1987)
Simulation of climate change due to increased atmospheric carbon dioxideMeteorological Magazine, 1385
J. Penner, Sophia Zhang, M. Chin, Catherine Chuang, J. Feichter, Yan Feng, I. Geogdzhayev, P. Ginoux, M. Herzog, A. Higurashi, D. Koch, C. Land, U. Lohmann, M. Mishchenko, T. Nakajima, G. Pitari, B. Soden, I. Tegen, Lawrence Stowe (2002)
A Comparison of Model- and Satellite-Derived Aerosol Optical Depth and ReflectivityJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 59
E. Roeckner, L. Bengtsson, J. Feichter, J. Lelieveld, H. Rodhe (1999)
Transient Climate Change Simulations with a Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean GCM Including the Tropospheric Sulfur CycleJournal of Climate, 12
M. Allen, W. Ingram (2002)
Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycleNature, 419
G. Roelofs, P. Kasibhatla, L. Barrie, D. Bergmann, C. Bridgeman, M. Chin, J. Christensen, R. Easter, J. Feichter, A. Jeuken, E. Kjellström, D. Koch, C. Land, U. Lohmann, P. Rasch (2001)
Analysis of regional budgets of sulfur species modeled for the COSAM exerciseTellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 53
J. Feichter, U. Lohmann, I. Schult (1997)
The atmospheric sulfur cycle in ECHAM-4 and its impact on the shortwave radiationClimate Dynamics, 13
A. Timmermann, J. Oberhuber, A. Bacher, M. Esch, M. Latif, E. Roeckner (1999)
Increased El Niño frequency in a climate model forced by future greenhouse warmingNature, 398
H. Sundqvist, E. Berge, J. Kristjánsson (1989)
Condensation and Cloud Parameterization Studies with a Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction ModelMonthly Weather Review, 117
J. Langner, H. Rodhe (1991)
A global three-dimensional model of the tropospheric sulfur cycleJournal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 13
C. Benkovitz, C. Berkowitz, R. Easter, S. Nemesure, R. Wagener, S. Schwartz (1994)
Sulfate over the North Atlantic and adjacent continental regions: Evaluation for October and November 1986 using a three-dimensonal model driven by observation-derived meteorologyJournal of Geophysical Research, 99
R. Charlson, M. Pilat (1969)
Climate: The Influence of AerosolsJournal of Applied Meteorology, 8
P. Rasch, J. Feichter, K. Law, N. Mahowald, J. Penner, C. Benkovitz, C. Genthon, C. Giannakopoulos, P. Kasibhatla, D. Koch, H. Levy, T. Maki, M. Prather, D. Roberts, G. Roelofs, D. Stevenson, Z. Stockwell, S. Taguchi, M. Kritz, M. Chipperfield, D. Baldocchi, P. Mcmurry, L. Barrie, Y. Balkanski, R. Chatfield, E. Kjellstrom, M. Lawrence, H. Lee, J. Lelieveld, K. Noone, J. Seinfeld, G. Stenchikov, S. Schwartz, C. Walcek, D. Williamson (2000)
A comparison of scavenging and deposition processes in global models: results from the WCRP Cambridge Workshop of 1995Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 52
E. Monahan, D. Spiel, K. Davidson (1986)
A Model of Marine Aerosol Generation Via Whitecaps and Wave Disruption
W. Cooke, C. Liousse, H. Cachier, J. Feichter (1999)
Construction of a 1° × 1° fossil fuel emission data set for carbonaceous aerosol and implementation and radiative impact in the ECHAM4 modelJournal of Geophysical Research, 104
A. Kettle, M. Andreae, D. Amouroux, T. Andreae, T. Bates, H. Berresheim, H. Bingemer, R. Boniforti, M. Curran, G. DiTullio, G. Helas, G. Jones, Maureen Keller, R. Kiene, C. Leck, M. Levasseur, G. Malin, M. Maspero, P. Matrai, A. McTaggart, N. Mihalopoulos, B. Nguyen, A. Novo, J. Putaud, S. Rapsomanikis, Gregory Roberts, G. Schebeske, Sangeeta Sharma, R. Simó, R. Staubes, S. Turner, G. Uher (1999)
A global database of sea surface dimethylsulfide (DMS) measurements and a procedure to predict sea surface DMS as a function of latitude, longitude, and monthGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 13
E. Roeckner, K. Arpe, L. Bengtsson, M. Christoph, M. Claussen, L. Dümenil, M. Esch, M. Giorgetta, U. Schlese, Uwe Schulzweida (1996)
The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate
K. Williams, A. Jones, D. Roberts, C. Senior, M. Woodage (2001)
The response of the climate system to the indirect effects of anthropogenic sulfate aerosolClimate Dynamics, 17
P. Hobbs (1999)
An overview of the University of Washington airborne measurements and results from the Tropospheric Aerosol Radiative Forcing Observational Experiment (TARFOX)
(1995)
Climatic response to anthropogenic sulfate forcing simulated with a general circulation model
P. Rasch, M. Barth, J. Kiehl, S. Schwartz, C. Benkovitz (2000)
A description of the global sulfur cycle and its controlling processes in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, Version 3Journal of Geophysical Research, 105
N. Mahowald, K. Kohfeld, M. Hansson, Y. Balkanski, S. Harrison, I. Prentice, M. Schulz, H. Rodhe (1999)
Dust sources and deposition during the last glacial maximum and current climate: A comparison of model results with paleodata from ice cores and marine sedimentsJournal of Geophysical Research, 104
M. Tiedtke (1989)
A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale ModelsMonthly Weather Review, 117
U. Lohmann, W. Leaitch, L. Barrie, K. Law, Y. Yi, D. Bergmann, C. Bridgeman, M. Chin, J. Christensen, R. Easter, J. Feichter, A. Jeuken, E. Kjellström, D. Koch, C. Land, P. Rasch, G. Roelofs (2001)
Vertical distributions of sulfur species simulated by large scale atmospheric models in COSAM: Comparison with observationsTellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 53
J. Hansen, Makiko Sato, R. Ruedy (1997)
Radiative forcing and climate responseJournal of Geophysical Research, 102
J. Feichter, E. Kjellström, H. Rodhe, F. Dentener, Jos Lelieveldi, G. Roelofs (1996)
Simulation of the tropospheric sulfur cycle in a global climate modelAtmospheric Environment, 30
J. Kiehl, B. Briegleb (1993)
The Relative Roles of Sulfate Aerosols and Greenhouse Gases in Climate ForcingScience, 260
V. Ramanathan, P. Crutzen, A. Mitra, D. Sikka (2002)
The Indian Ocean Experiment and the Asian Brown CloudCurrent Science, 83
C. Liousse, J. Penner, C. Chuang, J. Walton, H. Eddleman, H. Cachier (1996)
A global three‐dimensional model study of carbonaceous aerosolsJournal of Geophysical Research, 101
U. Lohmann, E. Roeckner (1996)
Design and performance of a new cloud microphysics scheme developed for the ECHAM general circulation modelClimate Dynamics, 12
U. Lohmann (2002)
Possible Aerosol Effects on Ice Clouds via Contact NucleationJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 59
S. Rasool, Stephen Schneider (1971)
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global ClimateScience, 173
J. Haywood, R. Stouffer, R. Wetherald, S. Manabe, V. Ramaswamy (1997)
Transient response of a coupled model to estimated changes in greenhouse gas and sulfate concentrationsGeophysical Research Letters, 24
E. Berge (1993)
Coupling of wet scavenging of sulphur to clouds in a numerical weather prediction modelTellus B, 45
K. Beheng (1994)
A parameterization of warm cloud microphysical conversion processesAtmospheric Research, 33
U. Lohmann, J. Feichter (2001)
Can the direct and semi‐direct aerosol effect compete with the indirect effect on a global scale?Geophysical Research Letters, 28
L. Rotstayn, U. Lohmann (2002)
Simulation of the tropospheric sulfur cycle in a global model with a physically based cloud schemeJournal of Geophysical Research, 107
U. Lohmann (1999)
Erratum: ``Prediction of the number of cloud droplets in the ECHAM GCM''Journal of Geophysical Research
B. Albrecht (1989)
Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional CloudinessScience, 245
Petr Ch�lek, J. Coakley (1974)
Aerosols and ClimateScience, 183
P. Rasch, M. Lawrence (1998)
Recent Development in Transport Methods at NCAR
P. Kasibhatla (1993)
NOY from sub‐sonic aircraft emissions: A Global three‐dimensional model studyGeophysical Research Letters, 20
G. Roelofs, J. Lelieveld, J. Feichter (1998)
Model simulations of the changing distribution of Ozone and its radiative forcing of climate: past, present and future
P. Ginoux, M. Chin, I. Tegen, J. Prospero, B. Holben, O. Dubovik, Shian‐Jiann Lin (2001)
Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART modelJournal of Geophysical Research, 106
J. Morcrette (1991)
Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts forecasting systemJournal of Geophysical Research, 96
U. Lohmann, G. Lesins (2002)
Stronger Constraints on the Anthropogenic Indirect Aerosol EffectScience, 298
S. Brinkop, E. Roeckner (1995)
Sensitivity of a general circulation model to parameterizations of cloud–turbulence interactions in the atmospheric boundary layerTellus A, 47
M. Giorgetta, M. Wild (1995)
The water vapour continuum and its representation in ECHAM4
B. Rockel, E. Raschke, B. Weyres (1991)
A parameterization of broad band radiative transfer properties of water, ice, and mixed cloudsContributions to atmospheric physics, 64
U. Lohmann, W. Leaitch, L. Barrie, K. Law, Y. Yi, D. Bergmann, C. Bridgeman, M. Chin, J. Christensen, R. Easter, J. Feichter, A. Jeuken, E. Kjellström, D. Koch, C. Land, P. Rasch, G. Roelofs (2001)
Vertical distributions of sulfur species simulated by large scale atmospheric models in COSAM: Comparison with observations: Atmospheric models in COSAMTellus B, 53
G. Tselioudis, A. Delgenio, William Kovari, M. Yao (1998)
Temperature Dependence of Low Cloud Optical Thickness in the GISS GCM: Contributing Mechanisms and Climate ImplicationsJournal of Climate, 11
A. Ackerman, O. Toon, D. Stevens, A. Heymsfield, V. Ramanathan, E. Welton (2000)
Reduction of tropical cloudiness by sootScience, 288 5468
S. Kinne, U. Lohmann, J. Feichter, M. Schulz, C. Timmreck, S. Ghan, R. Easter, M. Chin, P. Ginoux, T. Takemura, I. Tegen, D. Koch, M. Herzog, J. Penner, G. Pitari, B. Holben, T. Eck, A. Smirnov, O. Dubovik, I. Slutsker, D. Tanré, O. Torres, M. Mishchenko, I. Geogdzhayev, D. Chu, Y. Kaufman (2003)
Monthly Averages of Aerosol Properties: A Global Comparison Among Models, Satellite Data, and AERONET Ground DataJournal of Geophysical Research, 108
A. Dai, A. Genio, I. Fung (1997)
Clouds, precipitation and temperature rangeNature, 386
P. Rasch, M. Barth, J. Kiehl, S. Schwartz, C. Benkovitz (2000)
A DESCRIPTION OF THE GLOBAL SULFUR CYCLE AND ITS CONTROLLING PROCESSES IN THE NCAR CCM3
In a series of equilibrium experiments the climate response to present-day radiative forcings of anthropogenic greenhouse gases and aerosol particles is calculated. The study was performed with a model system consisting of the ECHAM4 atmospheric general circulation model coupled to a slab ocean and thermodynamic sea ice model. The model includes transport of the relevant chemical constituents, a sulfur chemistry model that calculates sulfate production in the gas and aqueous phase, and an aerosol model that accounts for source and sink processes. The aerosol cycle, the hydrological cycle, and the atmospheric dynamics are fully interactive. The climate response to aerosol forcing is not just a mirror image of the response to greenhouse forcing. This applies to the temperature changes, which are regionally more uniform for greenhouse forcing than for aerosol forcing as is already well known, and, in particular, to the hydrological cycle: the global hydrological sensitivity (Δprecip/Δtemp) to a 1-K surface temperature change is almost 3 times higher for aerosol forcing than for greenhouse forcing. When both forcings are combined, a global warming is simulated while evaporation and precipitation decrease by about 2% K −1 , resulting in a negative hydrological sensitivity. A strong dependency of the response to the type of forcing has also been found for the cloud water content and, consequently, for the change in cloud radiative forcing, which is substantially larger in the combined forcing experiment than in either of the individual forcing experiments. Consequently, the global warming for combined forcing is significantly smaller (0.57 K) than that obtained by adding the individual changes (0.85 K). Due to feedbacks between temperature changes and the hydrological cycle the simulated aerosol load, applying the same source strength, is considerably lower in a warmer climate (−17% K −1 warming). A consequence of this aerosol–temperature feedback could be that a future increase in greenhouse gases may reduce the aerosol burden even if the source strength would not change.
Journal of Climate – American Meteorological Society
Published: Jun 25, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.