Search

Filter

  • Advanced Filters:

  • to
  • Specific Data Sources:

    All Edit

    Select All  |  Select None

Reset filters

The results of investigations in laboratory medicine are used for many purposes. Most are performed for monitoring individuals in acute situations and following the improvement or deterioration of chronic disease. In diagnosis, case-finding, and screening, conventional population-based reference intervals are relevant, and they are partitioned if necessary according to age, sex, or other important characteristics. In spite of the advantages of fixed decision limits, these intervals remain the mainstay of interpreting numerical results. Such tools are of very limited use, however, in evaluating serial results obtained for an individual. Within-individual biological variation is well known to be much smaller than between-individual variation for nearly all substances assayed in laboratory medicine (1). Each individual has a range of values that span only a part of the reference interval. In consequence, individuals can have important changes in results when they all lie within the reference interval. Such changes will usually be considered unremarkable by both laboratory professionals and clinicians, and thus ignored. In addition, results can change from inside to outside the interval (and vice versa) without having clinical importance. Laboratories conventionally flag results outside the reference limits, probably provoking some unnecessary follow-up activity, if only a repetition of the investigation (2). Katzmann and coworkers in the current issue of the Journal have tackled the difficult problem of establishing criteria for monitoring changes in monoclonal protein concentrations (3). For some laboratory investigations, expert groups have recommended numerical criteria for interpreting changes. For the abnormal proteins in serum and urine investigated by Katzmann and colleagues (3), the guidelines from such expert groups state that reductions in the monoclonal protein in serum of at least 25% and 50% are considered minimal and partial responses, respectively, and the corresponding responses for urine monoclonal protein require at least . . .

End of preview. The entire article is 3 pages. To view the full-text, please rent this article to continue.

/lp/american-association-for-clinical-chemistry/improved-monitoring-of-differences-in-serial-laboratory-results-XDMu0hOjRE
Welcome to DeepDyve! Rent Premier Research Articles and Save Up to 90%

Learn more

Bookmark

Improved Monitoring of Differences in Serial Laboratory Results

Fraser, Callum G.
Clinical Chemistry , Volume 57 (12): 1635
American Association for Clinical ChemistryDec 1, 2011

More Info

More Like This Article

View All dataSource[]=actageo&dataSource[]=aspet&dataSource[]=aaos&dataSource[]=aacc&dataSource[]=aacr&dataSource[]=aea&dataSource[]=aip&dataSource[]=ajnr&dataSource[]=ams&dataSource[]=aps_physical&dataSource[]=appi_book&dataSource[]=appi_journal&dataSource[]=apha&dataSource[]=asip&dataSource[]=asm&dataSource[]=asn&dataSource[]=aspb&dataSource[]=avs&dataSource[]=annual_reviews&dataSource[]=arxiv&dataSource[]=acm&dataSource[]=berghahn&dataSource[]=cabi&dataSource[]=clinical_trials&dataSource[]=dailymed&dataSource[]=degruyter&dataSource[]=du_press&dataSource[]=esa&dataSource[]=eu_press&dataSource[]=elsevier&dataSource[]=emerald&dataSource[]=ejtr&dataSource[]=emea&dataSource[]=epo&dataSource[]=faseb&dataSource[]=gsa&dataSource[]=health_affairs&dataSource[]=hindawi&dataSource[]=imanager&dataSource[]=imedpub&dataSource[]=informa_healthcare&dataSource[]=informs&dataSource[]=iop&dataSource[]=iucr&dataSource[]=iospress&dataSource[]=jbjs&dataSource[]=leftcoast&dataSource[]=lu_press&dataSource[]=mesharpe&dataSource[]=mary_ann_liebert&dataSource[]=medline&dataSource[]=mit_press&dataSource[]=nature&dataSource[]=oxford&dataSource[]=pier_professional&dataSource[]=pnas&dataSource[]=portlandpress&dataSource[]=psyc_articles&dataSource[]=psyc_books&dataSource[]=psyc_critiques&dataSource[]=plos_journal&dataSource[]=pubmed_central&dataSource[]=rsna&dataSource[]=rockefeller&dataSource[]=rcn&dataSource[]=ria&dataSource[]=rsc&dataSource[]=sage&dataSource[]=spie&dataSource[]=springer_journal&dataSource[]=springer&dataSource[]=taylor_francis&dataSource[]=aps&dataSource[]=the_scientist&dataSource[]=uc_press&dataSource[]=uspto_abstract&dataSource[]=wiley&dataSource[]=pct

Browse: Subject Areas | Journals | Publishers

Sign Up for a DeepDyve Account

Bookmark an Article

To bookmark an article, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don't already have one.

OK

Subscribe to Journal Email Alerts

To subscribe to email alerts, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don't already have one.

OK

Thank you for renting with DeepDyve

Your PayPal account has been charged $3.99. You now have access to the full text of this article. A rental receipt has also been sent to your email address.

Your credit card has been charged $3.99. You now have access to the full text of this article. A rental receipt has also been sent to your email address.

OK

New! You can now keep track of new articles from Clinical Chemistry on your personalized homepage! Learn more

PDF Download — Not Available

Thanks for your interest in purchasing the PDF. Your request has been noted and we will work with our publisher partner to discuss enabling this feature.

In the meantime, you can get the PDF by visiting the publisher site.

Thank you for purchasing with DeepDyve

Your PayPal account has been charged $.

Your credit card has been charged $.

You can now download this article. A purchase receipt has also been sent to your email address.

Download This Article or I'm done with my download

Print Page — Not Available

Thanks for your interest in printing individual pages. Your request has been noted and we will work with our publisher partner to discuss enabling this feature.

In the meantime, you can get the PDF by visiting the publisher site.

Thank you for printing with DeepDyve

Your PayPal account has been charged $0.

Your credit card has been charged $0.

You can now print this article. A purchase receipt has also been sent to your email address.

Print the Selected Pages or I'm done with my printing

Please refresh to generate a new download link

Your article download link has expired. Please refresh this page to obtain a new download link and try again.

Follow a Journal

To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don't already have one.

OK