Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

6 Supreme Court of Brazil: Associação Brasileira de Incorporadoras Imobiliárias (Abrainc) v Brazil, adi 5209/df, 16 May 2016 [“Black List”]

6 Supreme Court of Brazil: Associação Brasileira de Incorporadoras Imobiliárias (Abrainc) v... Decision-making body: Supreme Court of BrazilCase details:Associação Brasileira de Incorporadoras Imobiliárias (Abrainc) v Brazil,adi 5209/DF, 16 May 2016 [“Black List”]Primary legal issues: Due process; publication of labor black list; public policy on private-sector naming and shamingApplicable legal provision: Article 5(ii), (liv), (lv) and (lvii) of Interministerial Ordinance No. 2/2011 of Brazil; Article 87(ii) of the Constitution of BrazilRelated case: Supreme Court of Brazil, Confederação Nacional da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil (cna) v Brazil, adi 5115/DF, 24 April 2014Link to case [in Portuguese]:http://s.conjur.com.br/dl/stf-libera-lista-suja-trabalho-escravo.pdfSummaryAssociação Brasileira de Incorporadoras Imobiliárias (Abrainc) v Brazil was a constitutional challenge to the Interministerial Ordinance No. 2/2011 (rules regarding the forced labor black list) brought by the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Brazil (Abrainc) before the Brazilian Supreme Court. The primary allegation involved due process infringement in regard to what is known as the black list. Other charges focused on separation of powers, presumption of innocence, and reasonability considerations. During the year-end recess of 2014, Supreme Court Justice Ricardo Lewandowski (then acting President of the Court) granted a preliminary injunction ordering the Ministry of Labor to stop publishing the list. The Federal Administration and the Brazilian Federal Public Ministry then defended the constitutionality of the list, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Labor Rights Case Law Brill

6 Supreme Court of Brazil: Associação Brasileira de Incorporadoras Imobiliárias (Abrainc) v Brazil, adi 5209/df, 16 May 2016 [“Black List”]

International Labor Rights Case Law , Volume 3 (1): 4 – Dec 27, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/6-supreme-court-of-brazil-associa-o-brasileira-de-incorporadoras-dpZiLTWFsK

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
2405-688X
eISSN
2405-6901
DOI
10.1163/24056901-00301012
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Decision-making body: Supreme Court of BrazilCase details:Associação Brasileira de Incorporadoras Imobiliárias (Abrainc) v Brazil,adi 5209/DF, 16 May 2016 [“Black List”]Primary legal issues: Due process; publication of labor black list; public policy on private-sector naming and shamingApplicable legal provision: Article 5(ii), (liv), (lv) and (lvii) of Interministerial Ordinance No. 2/2011 of Brazil; Article 87(ii) of the Constitution of BrazilRelated case: Supreme Court of Brazil, Confederação Nacional da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil (cna) v Brazil, adi 5115/DF, 24 April 2014Link to case [in Portuguese]:http://s.conjur.com.br/dl/stf-libera-lista-suja-trabalho-escravo.pdfSummaryAssociação Brasileira de Incorporadoras Imobiliárias (Abrainc) v Brazil was a constitutional challenge to the Interministerial Ordinance No. 2/2011 (rules regarding the forced labor black list) brought by the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Brazil (Abrainc) before the Brazilian Supreme Court. The primary allegation involved due process infringement in regard to what is known as the black list. Other charges focused on separation of powers, presumption of innocence, and reasonability considerations. During the year-end recess of 2014, Supreme Court Justice Ricardo Lewandowski (then acting President of the Court) granted a preliminary injunction ordering the Ministry of Labor to stop publishing the list. The Federal Administration and the Brazilian Federal Public Ministry then defended the constitutionality of the list,

Journal

International Labor Rights Case LawBrill

Published: Dec 27, 2017

There are no references for this article.