Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

ILO Committee on Freedom of Association: Complaint against the Government of El Salvador presented by the Trade Union Confederation of El Salvador Workers (CSTS), the Trade Union Federation of Food, Beverage, Hotel, Restaurant and AgroIndustry Workers of El Salvador (FESTSSABHRA) and the LIDO SA de CV Company Trade Union (SELSA), Case No. 2871, Report in which the Committee requests to be kept informed of developments. 13 June 2015

ILO Committee on Freedom of Association: Complaint against the Government of El Salvador... Decision-making body : ILO Committee on Freedom of Association. Case details : Complaint against the Government of El Salvador presented by the Trade Union Confederation of El Salvador Workers (CSTS), the Trade Union Federation of Food, Beverage, Hotel, Restaurant and AgroIndustry Workers of El Salvador (FESTSSABHRA) and the LIDO SA de CV Company Trade Union (SELSA), Case No. 2871, Report in which the Committee requests to be kept informed of developments. 13 th June 2015. Applicable legal provisions : Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98). Primary legal issues : The right to strike; strike ballots. Link to case: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_375796.pdf Summary Following up on its May-June 2014 report, the Committee on Freedom of Association sought updates from the government of El Salvador on a judicial ruling which declared a workers’ strike at LIDO SA de CV to be illegal. The strike had been deemed unlawful as it did not meet the required threshold: support from 51% of employees. The Labour Court had ruled that only 68 workers were on strike, while 253 of the company’s workers were working. In http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Labor Rights Case Law Brill

ILO Committee on Freedom of Association: Complaint against the Government of El Salvador presented by the Trade Union Confederation of El Salvador Workers (CSTS), the Trade Union Federation of Food, Beverage, Hotel, Restaurant and AgroIndustry Workers of El Salvador (FESTSSABHRA) and the LIDO SA de CV Company Trade Union (SELSA), Case No. 2871, Report in which the Committee requests to be kept informed of developments. 13 June 2015

International Labor Rights Case Law , Volume 1 (3): 289 – Oct 6, 2015

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/ilo-committee-on-freedom-of-association-complaint-against-the-of0X4lrd0j

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2015 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Subject
Right to Strike
ISSN
2405-688X
eISSN
2405-6901
DOI
10.1163/24056901-00103007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Decision-making body : ILO Committee on Freedom of Association. Case details : Complaint against the Government of El Salvador presented by the Trade Union Confederation of El Salvador Workers (CSTS), the Trade Union Federation of Food, Beverage, Hotel, Restaurant and AgroIndustry Workers of El Salvador (FESTSSABHRA) and the LIDO SA de CV Company Trade Union (SELSA), Case No. 2871, Report in which the Committee requests to be kept informed of developments. 13 th June 2015. Applicable legal provisions : Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98). Primary legal issues : The right to strike; strike ballots. Link to case: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_375796.pdf Summary Following up on its May-June 2014 report, the Committee on Freedom of Association sought updates from the government of El Salvador on a judicial ruling which declared a workers’ strike at LIDO SA de CV to be illegal. The strike had been deemed unlawful as it did not meet the required threshold: support from 51% of employees. The Labour Court had ruled that only 68 workers were on strike, while 253 of the company’s workers were working. In

Journal

International Labor Rights Case LawBrill

Published: Oct 6, 2015

There are no references for this article.