Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

RUSSIAN STUDIES: LITERATURE, FROM THE BEGINNING TO 1700

RUSSIAN STUDIES: LITERATURE, FROM THE BEGINNING TO 1700 Russian Studies LITERATURE, FROM THE BEGINNING TO 1700 By FAITH C. M. WIGZELL, LecturerinRussianLanguageandLiterature, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London I. GENERAL Published work this year reflects recent trends away from an emphasis on the social and historical and on 'original' works of early Russian literature towards problems of textology and studies of miscellanies. The sole textbook is *HcmopUR opeaHeU pyccKOU J!Ume­ pamypbl u Jtumepamypbt XVIII a. MemoooJtOZU'I{eCKoe noco6ue, ed. L. N. Guseva et al., Minsk, Byelorussia U.P., Ig82, I I I pp. On theoretical problems see H. Birnbaum's contribution to Markov and Worth, Kiev Congress, pp. Ig-64, which takes a semiotic approach to the definition of early Russian literature and its division into periods. For a more conventional discussion of the chronological limits of the Kievan period, see P. P. Okhrimenko's plea for a period stretching from the ninth to the first half of the I 3th c., and 0. V. Tvorogov's rejection of the earlier starting date in RusL, 26, no. 4: I I3-I7, I IS--27. Gail Lenhoff considers Old Russian literature in the light ofMukafovsk-y's theories, which she finds of some relevance, Vodicka Vol., pp. 32I-40. More interesting is her article in http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies Brill

RUSSIAN STUDIES: LITERATURE, FROM THE BEGINNING TO 1700

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/russian-studies-literature-from-the-beginning-to-1700-ln0WpLmEdu

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0084-4152
eISSN
2222-4297
DOI
10.1163/22224297-90002614
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Russian Studies LITERATURE, FROM THE BEGINNING TO 1700 By FAITH C. M. WIGZELL, LecturerinRussianLanguageandLiterature, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London I. GENERAL Published work this year reflects recent trends away from an emphasis on the social and historical and on 'original' works of early Russian literature towards problems of textology and studies of miscellanies. The sole textbook is *HcmopUR opeaHeU pyccKOU J!Ume­ pamypbl u Jtumepamypbt XVIII a. MemoooJtOZU'I{eCKoe noco6ue, ed. L. N. Guseva et al., Minsk, Byelorussia U.P., Ig82, I I I pp. On theoretical problems see H. Birnbaum's contribution to Markov and Worth, Kiev Congress, pp. Ig-64, which takes a semiotic approach to the definition of early Russian literature and its division into periods. For a more conventional discussion of the chronological limits of the Kievan period, see P. P. Okhrimenko's plea for a period stretching from the ninth to the first half of the I 3th c., and 0. V. Tvorogov's rejection of the earlier starting date in RusL, 26, no. 4: I I3-I7, I IS--27. Gail Lenhoff considers Old Russian literature in the light ofMukafovsk-y's theories, which she finds of some relevance, Vodicka Vol., pp. 32I-40. More interesting is her article in

Journal

The Year’s Work in Modern Language StudiesBrill

Published: Mar 13, 1984

There are no references for this article.