Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

French Studies: The Romantic Era

French Studies: The Romantic Era THE ROMANTIc E R A John Whittaker 1. Gener al M. Tilby, ‘Neologism: A Linguistic and Literary Obsession in Early Ninc et ee ne tn u t r h y - f rance’, MLR, 104, 2009:676–95, is a reasoned account of the strategies for the development of new words, starting in the 18th c. and persisting throughout our period. Particular attention is given to Nodier’s interest in neologism, though the spectrum is broad and related to all Romantic writers. J.-D L.i az, ‘Les Sociabilités littéraires autour de 1830: le rôle de la presse et de la littérature panoramiR qH ue LF ’, , 110:521–46, examines the mechanisms of the revolution whereby civilization could be said to have moved saf lr on o m to cénacl , elaying stress on the ability of the press, in its new form, to bring the life, identity, and personality of the author to the attention of the publicG . A li.n oer, ‘Sociabilité et temporalité: le cas des cénacles romantiques’, ib., 547–62, examines the similarities, differences, and development o cé f na th cr le e : e s that oL f a Muse française meeting at the house of the Deschamps family, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Year's Work in Modern Language Studies Brill

French Studies: The Romantic Era

Whittaker, John
The Year's Work in Modern Language Studies , Volume 72 (1): 12 – Jan 2, 2012
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/french-studies-the-romantic-era-MRl9zzf2Xo

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0084-4152
eISSN
2222-4297
DOI
10.1163/2222-4297-90000800
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

THE ROMANTIc E R A John Whittaker 1. Gener al M. Tilby, ‘Neologism: A Linguistic and Literary Obsession in Early Ninc et ee ne tn u t r h y - f rance’, MLR, 104, 2009:676–95, is a reasoned account of the strategies for the development of new words, starting in the 18th c. and persisting throughout our period. Particular attention is given to Nodier’s interest in neologism, though the spectrum is broad and related to all Romantic writers. J.-D L.i az, ‘Les Sociabilités littéraires autour de 1830: le rôle de la presse et de la littérature panoramiR qH ue LF ’, , 110:521–46, examines the mechanisms of the revolution whereby civilization could be said to have moved saf lr on o m to cénacl , elaying stress on the ability of the press, in its new form, to bring the life, identity, and personality of the author to the attention of the publicG . A li.n oer, ‘Sociabilité et temporalité: le cas des cénacles romantiques’, ib., 547–62, examines the similarities, differences, and development o cé f na th cr le e : e s that oL f a Muse française meeting at the house of the Deschamps family,

Journal

The Year's Work in Modern Language Studies – Brill

Published: Jan 2, 2012

There are no references for this article.