Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Walker (1992)
Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory
B. Cordier (2008)
Islamic faith-based development organizations in former Soviet Muslim environments: the Mountain Societies Development Support Programme in the Rasht valley, TajikistanCentral Asian Survey, 27
John Heathershaw (2009)
Post-Conflict Tajikistan: The politics of peacebuilding and the emergence of legitimate order
Simon Dalby (2008)
Imperialism, Domination, Culture: The Continued Relevance of Critical GeopoliticsGeopolitics, 13
H. Bennett, Julia Mediterraneans, B. Hayes, Michel Senellart, Liisa Purity (2015)
Preliminary List of Readings: Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso, 1983. Bastide, Roger. The African Religions of Brazil: Toward a Sociology of the
J. Staun (2010)
When, how and why elites frame terrorists: a Wittgensteinian analysis of terror and radicalisationCritical Studies on Terrorism, 3
Ole Wrver (1996)
European Security IdentitiesJournal of Common Market Studies, 34
Botakoz Kassymbekova (2011)
Humans as territory: forced resettlement and the making of Soviet Tajikistan, 1920–38Central Asian Survey, 30
S. Poynting (2012)
Counter-Terrorism and State Political Violence
John Heathershaw (2012)
Of National Fathers and Russian Elder Brothers: Conspiracy Theories and Political Ideas in Post-Soviet Central AsiaThe Russian Review, 71
François Debrix (2007)
Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, and Geopolitics
N. Fairclough (1992)
Discourse and social change
Between 2009 and 2011 Tajikistan experienced one of the worst bouts of political violence since the end of the country’s civil war. The fighting was concentrated in the Rasht Valley, an area traditionally associated with opposition to the regime. As a result, the government attempted to fix the meaning of the conflict around the signifiers “international terrorism” and “radical Islam.” This framing directly reproduced the regime’s hegemony through legitimating the removal of opponents and contrasting the Tajik “self” with the terrorist “other.” The hegemonic narrative was incomplete and contained inconsistencies. As a result, anti-hegemonic actors attempted to undermine its legitimacy. Although these critical articulations destabilized the narrative, due to their dispersed and divergent nature, it ultimately maintained its hegemonic position.
Central Asian Affairs – Brill
Published: Sep 12, 2014
Keywords: Tajikistan; terrorism; Islam; conflict; framing
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.