Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Manifest Excess of Powers as a Ground for the Annulment of ICSID Awards

Manifest Excess of Powers as a Ground for the Annulment of ICSID Awards This article provides academics and practitioners with a thorough overview and analysis of one of the most often invoked grounds in ICSID annulment procedures: ‘manifest excess of powers’. ICSID annulment committees have been criticised in the past for abandoning the distinction between appeal and annulment. In practice, recent annulment committees have shown considerable restraint when considering whether a tribunal has manifestly exceeded its powers. Although there have been two instances in recent years where the annulment committee annulled for what was effectively a (perceived) misapplication of the law by the tribunal, the latest ad hoc committees have not followed their example. Hopefully future committees will adopt an equally cautious approach. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of World Investment and Trade Brill

Manifest Excess of Powers as a Ground for the Annulment of ICSID Awards

Journal of World Investment and Trade , Volume 14 (5): 775 – Jan 1, 2013

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/manifest-excess-of-powers-as-a-ground-for-the-annulment-of-icsid-hPfQ7d4c6b

References (1)

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Subject
Articles
ISSN
1660-7112
eISSN
2211-9000
DOI
10.1163/22129000-01405001
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article provides academics and practitioners with a thorough overview and analysis of one of the most often invoked grounds in ICSID annulment procedures: ‘manifest excess of powers’. ICSID annulment committees have been criticised in the past for abandoning the distinction between appeal and annulment. In practice, recent annulment committees have shown considerable restraint when considering whether a tribunal has manifestly exceeded its powers. Although there have been two instances in recent years where the annulment committee annulled for what was effectively a (perceived) misapplication of the law by the tribunal, the latest ad hoc committees have not followed their example. Hopefully future committees will adopt an equally cautious approach.

Journal

Journal of World Investment and TradeBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2013

Keywords: international investment law; investment arbitration; ICSID; annulment; manifest excess of powers

There are no references for this article.