Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

CRITERIA FOR A LAW SPHERE

CRITERIA FOR A LAW SPHERE CRITERIA FOR A LAW SPHERE (with special emphasis on the 'psychic' modal aspect) by M. D. Stafteu Ever since Herman Dooyeweerd during a walk in the dunes of Holland conceived of the idea of mutually irreducible 'law spheres', people have objected to his designation of these 'modal aspects'. Recently, J. D. Dengerink proposed to consider 'time' as a modal aspect preceding all others!, and W. J. Ouweneel put forward arguments to replace the so-called psychic modal aspect by a 'perceptive' and a 'sensitive' one. 2 In this paper I intend to investigate these claims from a methodological point of view, summing up various methods for distinguishing a modal aspect. This means I shall only engage in a discussion of Dengerink's view of time and Ouweneel's psychology as far as these are relevant to the investigation of the philosophical criteria for the distinction for the various modal aspects. By way of example my investigation will be focussed on the psychic modal aspect, the law sphere that according to Dooyeweerd appears between the biotic and the logical aspects. My approach will be heuristic and practical. Because the modal aspects are found by abstraction I shall start with a discussion of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Philosophia Reformata Brill

CRITERIA FOR A LAW SPHERE

Philosophia Reformata , Volume 53 (2): 171 – Feb 20, 1988

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/criteria-for-a-law-sphere-nF0fsbWLWD

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© Copyright 1988 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0031-8035
eISSN
2352-8230
DOI
10.1163/22116117-90001500
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

CRITERIA FOR A LAW SPHERE (with special emphasis on the 'psychic' modal aspect) by M. D. Stafteu Ever since Herman Dooyeweerd during a walk in the dunes of Holland conceived of the idea of mutually irreducible 'law spheres', people have objected to his designation of these 'modal aspects'. Recently, J. D. Dengerink proposed to consider 'time' as a modal aspect preceding all others!, and W. J. Ouweneel put forward arguments to replace the so-called psychic modal aspect by a 'perceptive' and a 'sensitive' one. 2 In this paper I intend to investigate these claims from a methodological point of view, summing up various methods for distinguishing a modal aspect. This means I shall only engage in a discussion of Dengerink's view of time and Ouweneel's psychology as far as these are relevant to the investigation of the philosophical criteria for the distinction for the various modal aspects. By way of example my investigation will be focussed on the psychic modal aspect, the law sphere that according to Dooyeweerd appears between the biotic and the logical aspects. My approach will be heuristic and practical. Because the modal aspects are found by abstraction I shall start with a discussion of

Journal

Philosophia ReformataBrill

Published: Feb 20, 1988

There are no references for this article.