Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Trade dispute - act in furtherance of - procuring breach of contract - ballot in favour of industrial action - union serving employer with notice of industrial action listing over 600 employees joining union after ballot - whether industrial action having support of ballot - whether union immune from suit HEADNOTES Facts In furtherance of a legitimate trade dispute the defendant trade union called on its members to take industrial action and under section 226A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 gave notice to the plaintiff employers on 27 July 1995 that it intended to hold a ballot. Pursuant to section 234A of the Act of 1992 the union served the employers with a list of some 5,000 union members then employed by them and who were entitled to vote. The ballot was held between 4 and 7 August, in excess of 2,000 members voting in favour of industrial action and 622 against. On 17 August the union notified the employers of the result of the ballot and, pursuant to section 234A of the Act of 1992, served notice of its intention to call for industrial action on dates between 25 August and 4
International Labour Law Reports Online – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.