Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Employer's right to change long period of annual leave designated by employee HEADNOTES Facts The appellant was a journalist employed by the appellee news agency. He belonged to the section concerned with local news, which consisted of 41 journalists. Of these 31 worked outside. The appellant had been attached as a journalist to the Ministry of Science and Technology since 1978; from 1979 he was the only one so assigned. To cover his field, he had acquired professional knowledge and experi- ence regarding science and technology, particularly atomic energy. In July 1980 he proposed taking paid annual leave from 20 August to 20 September, to collect materials on atomic power generation in Europe. At that time he had a right to 40 days of paid annual holiday. Of these he planned to take 24 days during the designated period. The chief of the local news section agreed to part of his proposal, i.e. to take leave from 20 August to 3 September, but ordered him to perform his normal duties from 4 to 20 September. In the view of the chief, the activities of the news agency would be crippled by the appellant's absence for one month, while
International Labour Law Reports Online – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.