Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Hospital Oncologico de Cataluña v. Prometco M.N. Contract of employment ― wages ― payment for period during which services not rendered for reasons for which employer is responsible HEADNOTES Facts Prometco M.N. was engaged by the Cancer Hospital of Catalonia and the Baleares to carry out specified functions as a workman. While his contract was in force, the absence of activity on certain worksites in the hospital precluded the performance of his services. He repeatedly asked the under- taking to give him work, and took a variety of steps before the governing bodies of the hospital with a view to being fully integrated in the work for which he had been engaged. In the absence of any reaction by the under- taking, he submitted a claim to the competent labour court, based on S.30 of the Workers' Charter, calling for the performance of the contract and the payment of wages due for the period of inactivity, as well as an order that wages be paid monthly on time in the future. The Court decided in his favour. The Hospital introduced an appeal in cassation before the Supreme Court. It argued that there had not been non-performance of the
International Labour Law Reports Online – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1987
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.