Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
on the flowering of first movements, and then parties, during the Gorbachev era. Thus the book enriches a literature including Hosking, Aves and Duncan, McFaul and Markov, and Saivetz and J o n e s . Urban et al. carry the story of t h e s e institutions further forward into the EI'tsin era than others have done, and this alone would make it a valuable contribution. However the book g o e s far beyond this. Urban is c o n c e r n e d to demon- strate the factors that both permitted and e n c o u r a g e d the rebirth, and also s h a p e d the character of, the reemergent civil and political society. He a r g u e s that the nature of the Communist polity and society during the pre-perestroika era s h a p e d the character of that era in general, and t h e character of the emergent mass politics in particular. His central argument is that, contrary to most scholarly belief, the Soviet state, and its particular political institutions were weak, rather than strong, dominated by personal
Canadian-American Slavic Studies – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.