Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Silke Glitsch. Die Konstituierung von Utopie in Sergej Esenins Poem 'Inonija'. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 1996. 196 pp. DM 88 (paper).

Silke Glitsch. Die Konstituierung von Utopie in Sergej Esenins Poem 'Inonija'. Wiesbaden:... h a d warranted more of Keys's skillful critical scrutiny. O n e might also quarrel with s o m e of Keys's literary j u d g m e n t s , e.g., his calling Setchkareff's 1959 article on Briusov's narrative p r o s e "pedestrian" (p. 74), when that piece was meant only a s an introduction (and a s u c c e s s f u l one, at that) to totally neglected material; his calling P y m a n ' s History of R u s s i a n Symbollsm "splendid" (p. 77), when I found it too anec- dotal and exclusionary to constitute a fully satisfying "history"; and his neglect, except to cite it, of o n e of the most conceptually interesting and critically suggestive treatments of early modernist Russian prose, S. P. 11'ev's Rusakii simvolistskii roman (Kiev, 1991). ). Yet all of t h e s e reservations about Keys's extremely g o o d piece of work should in no way o b s c u r e what is genuinely his major accomplishment. Indeed, on the basis of the current volume we have every http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Canadian-American Slavic Studies Brill

Silke Glitsch. Die Konstituierung von Utopie in Sergej Esenins Poem 'Inonija'. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 1996. 196 pp. DM 88 (paper).

Ponomareff, Constantin V.
Canadian-American Slavic Studies , Volume 31 (4): 478 – Jan 1, 1997
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/silke-glitsch-die-konstituierung-von-utopie-in-sergej-esenins-poem-njrgv5NIBd

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1997 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0090-8290
eISSN
2210-2396
DOI
10.1163/221023997X01121
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

h a d warranted more of Keys's skillful critical scrutiny. O n e might also quarrel with s o m e of Keys's literary j u d g m e n t s , e.g., his calling Setchkareff's 1959 article on Briusov's narrative p r o s e "pedestrian" (p. 74), when that piece was meant only a s an introduction (and a s u c c e s s f u l one, at that) to totally neglected material; his calling P y m a n ' s History of R u s s i a n Symbollsm "splendid" (p. 77), when I found it too anec- dotal and exclusionary to constitute a fully satisfying "history"; and his neglect, except to cite it, of o n e of the most conceptually interesting and critically suggestive treatments of early modernist Russian prose, S. P. 11'ev's Rusakii simvolistskii roman (Kiev, 1991). ). Yet all of t h e s e reservations about Keys's extremely g o o d piece of work should in no way o b s c u r e what is genuinely his major accomplishment. Indeed, on the basis of the current volume we have every

Journal

Canadian-American Slavic Studies – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.