Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Wade, S. Arnold (1980)
The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedenceAnimal Behaviour, 28
Van Rhijn, Johan Gustaaf (1973)
Behavioural dimorphism in male ruffs Philomachus pugnax (L.)Behaviour, 47
H. Hansen (1905)
On the propagation, structure and classification of the family SphaeromidaeJournal of Cell Science, 49
S. Shuster (1981)
Sexual selection in the socorro isopod, Thermosphaeroma thermophilum (cole) (Crustacea: Peracarida)Animal Behaviour, 29
W. Hamilton (1979)
WINGLESS AND FIGHTING MALES IN FIG WASPS AND OTHER INSECTS
S. Austad (1984)
A Classification of Alternative Reproductive Behaviors and Methods for Field-testing ESS ModelsIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 24
D. Holdich (1971)
Changes in physiology, structure and histochemistry occurring during the life-history of the sexually dimorphic isopod Dynamene bidentata (Crustacea: Peracarida)Marine Biology, 8
D. Rubenstein (1984)
Resource Acquisition and Alternative Mating Strategies in Water StridersIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 24
R. Stein (1976)
Sexual dimorphism in crayfish chelae: functional significance linked to reproductive activitiesCanadian Journal of Zoology, 54
E. Iverson (1982)
Revision of the Isopod Family Sphaeromatidae (Crustacea: Isopoda: Flabellifera) I. Subfamily Names with Diagnoses and KeyJournal of Crustacean Biology, 2
N. Knowlton (1980)
SEXUAL SELECTION AND DIMORPHISM IN TWO DEMES OF A SYMBIOTIC, PAIR‐BONDING SNAPPING SHRIMPEvolution, 34
S. Perrill, H. Gerhardt, Richard Daniel (1978)
Sexual Parasitism in the Green Tree Frog (Hyla cinerea)Science, 200
W. Eberhard (1982)
Beetle Horn Dimorphism: Making the Best of a Bad LotThe American Naturalist, 119
M. Gross (1982)
Sneakers, Satellites and Parentals: Polymorphic Mating Strategies in North American SunfishesEthology, 60
T. Moore, M. Blum, Nancy Blum (1979)
Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in InsectsBioScience
R. Thornhill (1981)
Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) Scorpionflies: Systems for Understanding Resource-Defense Polygyny and Alternative Male Reproductive EffortsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 12
W. Cade (1981)
Alternative male strategies: genetic differences in crickets.Science, 212 4494
Mart Gross, E. Charnov (1980)
Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 77 11
R. Brusca (1973)
A handbook to the common intertidal invertebrates of the Gulf of California
M. Gadgil (1972)
Male Dimorphism as a Consequence of Sexual SelectionThe American Naturalist, 106
W. Dominey (1980)
Female mimicry in male bluegill sunfish—a genetic polymorphism?Nature, 284
E. Waltz, L. Wolf (1984)
By Jove!! Why Do Alternative Mating Tactics Assume So Many Different Forms?Integrative and Comparative Biology, 24
D. Morris (1951)
Homosexuality in the Ten-Spined Stickleback (Pygosteus Pungitius L.) 1)Behaviour, 4
G. Parker (1970)
The reproductive behavior and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae). II. The fertilization rate and the spatial and temporal relationships of each sex around the site of mating and ovipositionJournal of Animal Ecology, 39
L. Fairchild (1984)
Male Reproductive Tactics in an Explosive Breeding Toad PopulationIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 24
R. Howard (1984)
Alternative Mating Behaviors of Young Male BullfrogsIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 24
Males in many animal species exhibit discontinuous variation in behaviors and morphologies that are associated with reproduction (Parker, 1970; van Rhijn, 1973; Alcock, 1979; Hamilton, 1979; Perrill et al., 1978; Dominey, 1980; Gross and Charnov, 1980; Cade, 1981; Thornhill, 1981; Eberhard, 1982; Gross, 1982; Clutton-Brock et al., 1982; Austad, 1984; Howard, 1984; Gross, 1985). These alternative reproductive behaviors (ARBs) occur primarily in polygynous species in which variance in male mating success is high and thus in which sexual selection is strong (Gadgil, 1972). "Behaviors" are emphasized in this terminology, since male reproductive alternatives involving only facultative shifts in reproductive tactics are by far the most common, while ARBs involving morphological dif- ferences between males are comparatively rare. Moreover, differences in repro- ductive morphology are usually associated with specific differences in mating behavior (Austad, 1984). Reports of ARBs are few or nonexistent for the Crus- tacea. This is unexpected, since many crustaceans are polygynous (Salmon, 1984) and sexual selection has been demonstrated in a variety of species (Holdich, 1968, 1971; Stein, 1976; Knowlton, 1980; Shuster, 1981; Christy, 1983; review in Salm- on, 1984). The exemption of the Crustacea from what now seems a common evolutionary response to male sexual
Journal of Crustacean Biology – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1987
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.