Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jack Kaminsky (1999)
Making it ExplicitInternational Studies in Philosophy, 31
(2003)
Do inferential roles compose? Dialectica
N. Tennant (2003)
Frege's Content-Principle and Relevant DeducibilityJournal of Philosophical Logic, 32
P. Engel (2000)
Wherein Lies the Normative Dimension in Meaning and Mental Content?Philosophical Studies, 100
(2007)
Logical rules and the a priori: Good and bad questions
Wilfrid Sellars (1948)
Concepts as Involving Laws and Inconceivable without ThemPhilosophy of Science, 15
(2001)
Brandom's burdens
Vann McGee (1985)
A Counterexample to Modus PonensThe Journal of Philosophy, 82
W. Quine (1969)
Ontological Relativity and Other Essays
W. Hinzen (2001)
The Pragmatics Of Inferential ContentSynthese, 128
A. Prior (1964)
Conjunction and Contonktion RevisitedAnalysis, 24
(1974)
Meaning as functional classifi cation
P. Dekker (1998)
The Semantics of Dynamic Conjunction
N. Verschueren, W. Schaeken, G. d'Ydewalle (2005)
A dual-process specification of causal conditional reasoningThinking & Reasoning, 11
(1953)
Philosophische Untersuchungen . Oxford : Blackwell . English translation Philosophical Investigations
J. Peregrin (2006)
DEVELOPING SELLARS’S SEMANTIC LEGACY: MEANING AS A ROLE
J. Peregrin (2006)
Meaning as an Inferential RoleErkenntnis, 64
M. McCullagh (2005)
Do inferential roles composeDialectica, 57
(1997)
Th e Taming of the True
N. Belnap (1962)
Tonk, Plonk and PlinkAnalysis, 22
(1949)
Language , rules and behavior
Marian Counihan (2008)
‘if p then q’ . . . and all that: Logical Elements in Reasoning and DiscourseJournal of Logic, Language and Information, 17
(2002)
Tales of the Mighty Dead
A. Prior (1960)
The Runabout Inference-TicketAnalysis, 21
M. Dummett (1973)
Frege: Philosophy of Language
V. Sinisi (1996)
Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and NecessityInternational Studies in Philosophy, 28
J. Peregrin (2005)
Is Compositionality an Empirical Matter
M. Bílková, O. Tomala (2006)
The Logica Yearbook 2005
(1953)
Inference and meaning
J. Fodor, E. Lepore (1991)
Why meaning (probably) isn't conceptual roleMind & Language, 6
Alistair Lachlan, D. Dalen (1934)
Symbolic LogicNature, 24
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Inferentialism is a species of use-theory of meaning, which, however, identifies meanings neither with regularities of usage, nor with underlying dispositions, but rather with 'rules' of usage. is is, of course, underlain by the picture of language as an essentially rule governed enterprise. One of the frequent challenges to the inferentialist picture is that it cannot come up with a notion of meaning that would be compositional. In this paper I address this objection (as well as some other, related ones) and I show that it stems from a miscontrual of the inferentialist standpoint.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
International Review of Pragmatics – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Keywords: COMPOSITIONALITY; INFERENTIALISM; SEMANTICS
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.