Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Border Line Between Sympathy and Support: the United States and the Bulgarian Territorial Question at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919

The Border Line Between Sympathy and Support: the United States and the Bulgarian Territorial... ANDREIPANTEV THE BORDER LINE BETWEEN SYMPATHY AND SUPPORT: THE UNITED STATES AND THE B UL GARIAN TERRITORIAL Q UESTION A T THE PARIS PEA CE CONFERENCE IN 1919 Though Wickham Stead once wrote that the true story of the Paris Peace Conference would never be written, the literature on this fateful event is so tremendous that it could in itself be the object of a great deal of historiographic research. To the United States and Bulgaria, this conference held a special sig- nificance. To the former it meant a decisive though not very successful initial entry into a system of relationships with the rest of the great powers, while to Bulgaria it marked the final stage in the adverse adjustment of her territory that put a lasting imprint on her political development as a nation and a state. This identical significance of the conference in the two countries' histories has, however, had a disproportionate reflection in their respective historio- graphies. The Balkan aspe.cts of the Paris Peace Conference have been rather thoroughly investigated in the United States. However, the problems of Yugo- slavia,l Greece,2 Romania,3 Albania,4 and Bulgarias have been studied with- out arriving at a synthesized version http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Southeastern Europe Brill

The Border Line Between Sympathy and Support: the United States and the Bulgarian Territorial Question at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919

Southeastern Europe , Volume 8 (1): 171 – Jan 1, 1981

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-border-line-between-sympathy-and-support-the-united-states-and-the-0M4FwUtwY0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1981 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0094-4467
eISSN
1876-3332
DOI
10.1163/187633381X00127
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ANDREIPANTEV THE BORDER LINE BETWEEN SYMPATHY AND SUPPORT: THE UNITED STATES AND THE B UL GARIAN TERRITORIAL Q UESTION A T THE PARIS PEA CE CONFERENCE IN 1919 Though Wickham Stead once wrote that the true story of the Paris Peace Conference would never be written, the literature on this fateful event is so tremendous that it could in itself be the object of a great deal of historiographic research. To the United States and Bulgaria, this conference held a special sig- nificance. To the former it meant a decisive though not very successful initial entry into a system of relationships with the rest of the great powers, while to Bulgaria it marked the final stage in the adverse adjustment of her territory that put a lasting imprint on her political development as a nation and a state. This identical significance of the conference in the two countries' histories has, however, had a disproportionate reflection in their respective historio- graphies. The Balkan aspe.cts of the Paris Peace Conference have been rather thoroughly investigated in the United States. However, the problems of Yugo- slavia,l Greece,2 Romania,3 Albania,4 and Bulgarias have been studied with- out arriving at a synthesized version

Journal

Southeastern EuropeBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1981

There are no references for this article.