Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
n o t determine the g r o w t h o f bureaucracy but the very structure o f Bolshevik political power. T h e Red T e r r o r was n o t only wrong, it was counter-productive, according to Farber, only stimulating greater opposition to the Bolsheviks. The absence o f an oper- ational d e m o c r a t i c c o d e within the Leninist party m e a n t that it was susceptible to a m o r e p r o f o u n d authoritarianism than any hitherto encountered. Thus, Farber insists, while objective factors p l a y e d their part, the political nature o f Bolshevism interacted with circumstances in a catastrophic way for the development of socialism. Lenin h i m s e l f c o m e s o u t o f all this with a very diminished stature. W e a r e by n o w all familiar with his exaltation o f violence and terror and his inability to deal with substantive criticism in any rational way, but Farber focuses o n
Russian History – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.