Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Lynn Mally. Culture of the Future: The Proletkult Movement in Revolutionary Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990. xxix, 306 pp. $37.50.

Lynn Mally. Culture of the Future: The Proletkult Movement in Revolutionary Russia. Berkeley:... n o t determine the g r o w t h o f bureaucracy but the very structure o f Bolshevik political power. T h e Red T e r r o r was n o t only wrong, it was counter-productive, according to Farber, only stimulating greater opposition to the Bolsheviks. The absence o f an oper- ational d e m o c r a t i c c o d e within the Leninist party m e a n t that it was susceptible to a m o r e p r o f o u n d authoritarianism than any hitherto encountered. Thus, Farber insists, while objective factors p l a y e d their part, the political nature o f Bolshevism interacted with circumstances in a catastrophic way for the development of socialism. Lenin h i m s e l f c o m e s o u t o f all this with a very diminished stature. W e a r e by n o w all familiar with his exaltation o f violence and terror and his inability to deal with substantive criticism in any rational way, but Farber focuses o n http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Russian History Brill

Lynn Mally. Culture of the Future: The Proletkult Movement in Revolutionary Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990. xxix, 306 pp. $37.50.

Russian History , Volume 17 (4): 457 – Jan 1, 1990

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/lynn-mally-culture-of-the-future-the-proletkult-movement-in-SFdpFdSS0a

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1990 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0094-288X
eISSN
1876-3316
DOI
10.1163/187633190X00165
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

n o t determine the g r o w t h o f bureaucracy but the very structure o f Bolshevik political power. T h e Red T e r r o r was n o t only wrong, it was counter-productive, according to Farber, only stimulating greater opposition to the Bolsheviks. The absence o f an oper- ational d e m o c r a t i c c o d e within the Leninist party m e a n t that it was susceptible to a m o r e p r o f o u n d authoritarianism than any hitherto encountered. Thus, Farber insists, while objective factors p l a y e d their part, the political nature o f Bolshevism interacted with circumstances in a catastrophic way for the development of socialism. Lenin h i m s e l f c o m e s o u t o f all this with a very diminished stature. W e a r e by n o w all familiar with his exaltation o f violence and terror and his inability to deal with substantive criticism in any rational way, but Farber focuses o n

Journal

Russian HistoryBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1990

There are no references for this article.