Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
GEORGE P. MAJESKA (College Park, MD, USA) PATPJARCH PHOTIUS AND THE CONYERSION OF THE RUS" In the year 860, the Rus' attacked the city of Constantinople, burned and pillaged the suburbs, and, to judge from the vivid sermon of Patriarch Photius, sparked an immediate religious revival. A standard Byzantine re- sponse to "barbarian" threats and attacks such as this was an attempt to a) convert the troublesome nation to Christianity and thus (hopefully) defuse its . warlike behavior or, failing that, b) ally with a neighbor of the threatening 2 power.2 . This policy was probably the plan in the minds of the Byzantine decision makers when, shortly after the unexpected attack, they dispatched Professor Constantine the Philosopher (better known as St. Cyril, the Apostle of the Slavs) to Crimea and to the capital of the Khazar Kaganate, the power that dominated the steppe north of the Black and Caspian Seas.3 Why to Khazaria rather than to. Kiev on the Dnieper where the attack is normally assumed to - " have originated? And why Constantine? As far as we know he did not know Turkic, or Hebrew, the lingua franca of the Khazars; he did, however, know Slavic,4
Russian History – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.