Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Case of Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru before the Human Rights Committee

The Case of Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru before the Human Rights Committee The Case of Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru before the Human Rights Committee The Concept of Free Prior and Informed Consent and the Application of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to the Protection and Promotion of Indigenous Peoples' Rights Katja Göcke A. von Bogdandy and R. Wolfrum, (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 14, 2010, p. 337-370. © 2010 Koninklijke Brill N.V. Printed in The Netherlands. Max Planck UNYB 14 (2010) I. Introduction II. The Human Rights Committee III. The Case of Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru 1. Factual Background of the Case 2. Decision of the Human Rights Committee IV. Evaluation 1. Redefinition of the Complaint by the Human Rights Committee and Indigenous Peoples' Rights in the ICCPR in General a. Indigenous Peoples as Minorities pursuant to Article 27 ICCPR? b. The Adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the International Recognition of Indigenous Peoples as "Peoples" c. Implications of the Adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples for the Human Rights Committee 2. The Concept of Free, Prior and Informed Consent a. The Development of the Concept of Free, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online Brill

The Case of Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru before the Human Rights Committee

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-case-of-ngela-poma-poma-v-peru-before-the-human-rights-committee-owRQ2hxwzb

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright 2010 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1389-4633
eISSN
1875-7413
DOI
10.1163/18757413-90000055
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The Case of Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru before the Human Rights Committee The Concept of Free Prior and Informed Consent and the Application of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to the Protection and Promotion of Indigenous Peoples' Rights Katja Göcke A. von Bogdandy and R. Wolfrum, (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 14, 2010, p. 337-370. © 2010 Koninklijke Brill N.V. Printed in The Netherlands. Max Planck UNYB 14 (2010) I. Introduction II. The Human Rights Committee III. The Case of Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru 1. Factual Background of the Case 2. Decision of the Human Rights Committee IV. Evaluation 1. Redefinition of the Complaint by the Human Rights Committee and Indigenous Peoples' Rights in the ICCPR in General a. Indigenous Peoples as Minorities pursuant to Article 27 ICCPR? b. The Adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the International Recognition of Indigenous Peoples as "Peoples" c. Implications of the Adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples for the Human Rights Committee 2. The Concept of Free, Prior and Informed Consent a. The Development of the Concept of Free,

Journal

Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law OnlineBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.