Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Necessity of Historicism

The Necessity of Historicism AbstractRankean historicism is ordinarily seen nowadays as an outdated nineteenth century fashion and that we could not possibly tolerate in our modern intellectual homes. In opposition to this common wisdom I argue that historicism ‐ i.e. the claim that the nature of a thing is to be found in is history ‐ is no less true for all writing of history as it was in the days of Ranke. So Ranke was right, after all. I shall argue my untimely thesis by focusing on the historian’s language and by insisting that all the claims made by historicists such as Ranke make eminently sense if read as claim not about objects having existed in the past itself but about the language used by historians in their attempt to account for the past. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Philosophy of History Brill

The Necessity of Historicism

Ankersmit, Frank
Journal of the Philosophy of History , Volume 4 (2): 15 – Jan 1, 2010
Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-necessity-of-historicism-FHBCaIQYsZ

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1872-261X
eISSN
1872-2636
DOI
10.1163/187226310x509547
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractRankean historicism is ordinarily seen nowadays as an outdated nineteenth century fashion and that we could not possibly tolerate in our modern intellectual homes. In opposition to this common wisdom I argue that historicism ‐ i.e. the claim that the nature of a thing is to be found in is history ‐ is no less true for all writing of history as it was in the days of Ranke. So Ranke was right, after all. I shall argue my untimely thesis by focusing on the historian’s language and by insisting that all the claims made by historicists such as Ranke make eminently sense if read as claim not about objects having existed in the past itself but about the language used by historians in their attempt to account for the past.

Journal

Journal of the Philosophy of History – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.