Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reply to Zofia Stemplowska

Reply to Zofia Stemplowska Describes the author’s value of choice account of responsibility and examines a response by Stemplowska to an objection to this account, raised by Alex Voorhoeve. Argues that the problem raised by Voorhoeve’s example concerns the way in which risk is taken into account in contractualism rather than the value of choice account of responsibility. Departs from the author’s earlier work in arguing that the risk of harm should sometimes be taken into account on an ex ante rather than an ex post basis. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Moral Philosophy Brill

Reply to Zofia Stemplowska

Journal of Moral Philosophy , Volume 10 (4): 508 – Jan 1, 2013

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/reply-to-zofia-stemplowska-apYiiZjUm0

References (1)

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Subject
Articles
ISSN
1740-4681
eISSN
1745-5243
DOI
10.1163/17455243-01004012
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Describes the author’s value of choice account of responsibility and examines a response by Stemplowska to an objection to this account, raised by Alex Voorhoeve. Argues that the problem raised by Voorhoeve’s example concerns the way in which risk is taken into account in contractualism rather than the value of choice account of responsibility. Departs from the author’s earlier work in arguing that the risk of harm should sometimes be taken into account on an ex ante rather than an ex post basis.

Journal

Journal of Moral PhilosophyBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2013

Keywords: value of choice, contractualism, Voorhoeve, risk, ex ante valuation of harms

There are no references for this article.