Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1956)
Varieties of human values
U. Foa (1948)
An equal-I scale for measurement of attitudes towards Sabbath observance.The Journal of social psychology, 27 2
(1961)
Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, 1957. 14. Siegman, A. W., Some personality variables associated with future time perspective
(1948)
An equal interval scale for the measurement of attitudes towards Sabbath observance
H. Gough (1948)
A New Dimension of Status: II. Relationship of the St Scale to other VariablesAmerican Sociological Review, 13
J. Kittross (1959)
The measurement of meaningAudiovisual communication review, 7
H. Gough (1948)
A New Dimension of Status: I. Development of a Personality ScaleAmerican Sociological Review, 13
(1961)
Some personality variables associated with future time perspective
Evon Vogt, John Roberts (1956)
A Study of ValuesScientific American, 195
(1956)
Varieties of human
J. Flugel, C. Mace (1947)
Man, morals and society
(1952)
Effects of group pressure upon modification and distortion of group judgments
C. Morris (1957)
Varieties of Human Value
L. Thurstone, E. Chave
The Measurement Of Attitude
T. Adorno (1950)
The Authoritarian Personality
Personality and Socio-cultural Variables Associated with Religious Behavior1 ARON WOLFE SIEGMAN, Bar-Ilan University, Israel2 Many observers have already commented on the neglect of religion by recent students of human behavior. Let me only add that religion should be of interest to the psychologist, if only because it frequently is a pervasive and powerful motivating force in people's lives. It is well known that for religious reasons people have sacrificed not only their so-called basic needs, but also life itself. It is hoped that the studies which will be reported in this paper will help provide an explanation for the fact that religion could be such a powerful motivating force in human behavior. Most of the studies which are summarized in the present paper were undertaken in order to test some of the major hypotheses about the perso- nality variables which supposedly are responsible for individual differences in religious behavior. Insofar as these hypotheses are part of a more general theory of human behavior the results may also have broader theoretical implications. It should be pointed out, however, that unfortunately we were unable, in relation to most hypotheses, to perform the kind of crucial test which is expected in
Archive for the Psychology of Religion – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1962
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.