Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article God Is Watching You Priming God Concepts Increases Prosocial Behavior in an Anonymous Economic Game
Jo-Ann Tsang, W. Rowatt (2007)
The Relationship Between Religious Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, and Implicit Sexual PrejudiceThe International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17
C. Powers, R. Nam, W. Rowatt, Peter Hill (2007)
Associations between humility, spiritual transcendence, and forgiveness
G. Kelly (1955)
The psychology of personal constructs. Vol. 1. A theory of personality. Vol. 2. Clinical diagnosis and psychotherapy.
Peter Hill, K. Pargament (2003)
Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality. Implications for physical and mental health research.The American psychologist, 58 1
Megan Johnson, W. Rowatt, Jordan LaBouff (2010)
Priming Christian Religious Concepts Increases Racial PrejudiceSocial Psychological and Personality Science, 1
Dennison Nash, R. Stark, C. Glock (1968)
American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment.Social Forces, 47
(2000)
Die Religion der Gesellschaft [The religion of society
Eliot Smith, J. DeCoster (2000)
Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory SystemsPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 4
Jordan LaBouff (2011)
The ecological validity of priming religiousness : context and culture.
J. Wenger, Amy Daniels (2006)
Who Distinguishes Between Sinners and Sins at the Implicit Level of Awareness?The Journal of Social Psychology, 146
(2011)
Religion, Religiosität, Spiritualität. Bestimmungsversuche für komplexe Begriffe [Religion, religiosity, spirituality. Attempts at definitions for complex terms
R. Paloutzian, Crystal Park (2005)
Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality
W. Rowatt, Jo-Ann Tsang, Jess Kelly, Brooke LaMARTINA, Michelle McCullers, April McKINLEY (2006)
Associations Between Religious Personality Dimensions and Implicit Homosexual Prejudice.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45
J. Bavel, William Cunningham (2010)
A social neuroscience approach to self and social categorisation: A new look at an old issueEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 21
Beata Zarzycka (2006)
Stefan Huber, Zentralität und Inhalt. Ein neues multidimensionales Messmodell der Religiosität, Opladen: Leske–Budrich 2003, 9
Stefan Huber (2009)
Religion Monitor 2008: Structuring Principles, Operational Constructs, Interpretive Strategies
W. Rowatt, Lewis Franklin (2004)
RESEARCH: Christian Orthodoxy, Religious Fundamentalism, and Right-Wing Authoritarianism as Predictors of Implicit Racial PrejudiceThe International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14
A. Greenwald, Brian Nosek, M. Banaji (2003)
Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.Journal of personality and social psychology, 85 2
(2010)
Research in the Social Scientific Study of ReligionComparative Sociology
J. Wenger (2004)
RESEARCH: The Automatic Activation of Religious Concepts: Implications for Religious OrientationsThe International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14
S. Huber (2003)
Zentralität und Inhalt. Ein neues multidimensionales Messmodell der Religiosität
Megan Johnson, W. Rowatt, Jordan LaBouff (2012)
Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4
A. Greenwald, D. McGhee, Jordan Schwartz (1998)
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.Journal of personality and social psychology, 74 6
Kristin Lane, M. Banaji, Brian Nosek, A. Greenwald
Procedures and Their Implementation Understanding and Using the Iat 3 Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: Iv What We Know (so Far) about the Method
Peter Hill, K. Pargament (2008)
Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research.Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
Brian Nosek, A. Greenwald, M. Banaji (2005)
Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct ValidityPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31
C. Zwingmann, C. Klein, A. Büssing (2011)
Measuring Religiosity/Spirituality: Theoretical Differentiations and Categorization of InstrumentsReligion, 2
S. Huber (2004)
Zentralität und multidimensionale Struktur der Religiosität: Eine Synthese der theoretischen Ansätze von Allport und Glock zur Messung der Religiosität
S. Huber (2008)
Kerndimensionen, Zentralität und Inhalt. Ein interdisziplinäres Modell der Religiosität., 16
Andrew Karpinski (2004)
Measuring Self-Esteem using the Implicit Association Test: The Role of the OtherPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30
J. Wenger, Terrance Yarbrough (2005)
Religious Individuals: Evaluating Their Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations at the Implicit Level of AwarenessThe Journal of Social Psychology, 145
J. Jong (2012)
Implicit measures in the experimental psychology of religion
W. Ventis, C. Ball, C. Viggiano (2010)
A Christian Humanist Implicit Association Test: Validity and test−retest reliability.Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2
Jordan LaBouff, W. Rowatt, Megan Johnson, Michelle Thedford, Jo-Ann Tsang (2010)
Development and Initial Validation of an Implicit Measure of Religiousness-SpiritualityJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49
Jörg-Christian Renz (2006)
Zentralität und Inhalt. Ein neues multidimensionales Messmodell der Religiosität.Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65
Andrew Karpinski, Ross Steinman (2006)
The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition.Journal of personality and social psychology, 91 1
A. Cohen, A. Shariff, Peter Hill (2008)
The accessibility of religious beliefsJournal of Research in Personality, 42
Matthew Graham, M. McDonald, Derrick Klaassen (2008)
The International Journal for the Psychology of ReligionJournal of Psychology and Theology, 36
A. Greenwald, S. Farnham (2000)
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.Journal of personality and social psychology, 79 6
C. Gärtner, D. Pollack, Monika Wohlrab-Sahr (2003)
Atheismus und religiöse Indifferenz
Stefan Huber, Odilo Huber (2012)
The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)Religion, 3
G. Āllport, J. Ross (1967)
Personal religious orientation and prejudice.Journal of personality and social psychology, 5 4
Tobias Gschwendner, W. Hofmann, M. Schmitt (2006)
Moderatoren der Konsistenz implizit und explizit erfasster Einstellungen und PersönlichkeitsmerkmalePsychologische Rundschau, 57
Brian Nosek (2005)
Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 134 4
J. Wenger (2007)
The Implicit Nature of Intrinsic Religious PursuitThe International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17
W. Rowatt, C. Powers, Valerie Targhetta, Jessamy Comer, Stephanie Kennedy, Jordan LaBouff (2006)
Development and initial validation of an implicit measure of humility relative to arroganceThe Journal of Positive Psychology, 1
R. Fazio, M. Olson (2003)
Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use.Annual review of psychology, 54
A. Dijksterhuis, Jesse Preston, D. Wegner, H. Aarts (2008)
Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for eventsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44
A. Greenwald, M. Banaji, Laurie Rudman, S. Farnham, Brian Nosek, Deborah Mellott (2002)
A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.Psychological review, 109 1
W. Hofmann, Bertram Gawronski, Tobias Gschwendner, Huy Le, Manfred Schmitt (2005)
A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report MeasuresPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31
W. Rowatt, Lewis Franklin, Marla Cotton (2005)
Patterns and Personality Correlates of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Christians and MuslimsJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44
This study addressed the lack of implicit measures of religiosity in German research by developing a German Single Category Implicit Association Test ( sc-iat ) for measuring the associative religious self-concept. The sc-iat was applied to a sample consisting of 389 German students with different subjects of study and internally consistent ( r = .72). To estimate the psychometric criteria of construct validity, sc-iat scores were correlated to the Centrality of Religiosity Scale ( crs ), whose construct psychological approach can be theoretically linked to the concept of associative representations in the research on iat s. Corresponding to the average relationship between implicit and explicit measures in literature, the correlation was moderately ( r = .33). Group comparisons relating to religious affiliation and subject of study provided initial evidence for criterion validity. There were complications with the attribute category “non-religious,” especially by participants without a religious affiliation, however, the sc-iat could also provide a method to investigate this issue.
Archive for the Psychology of Religion – Brill
Published: Sep 15, 2014
Keywords: religiosity; measurement; Implicit Association Test ( iat ); dual process model; religious self-concept; religious construct system
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.