Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Letter to the Editor Giving Nicknames to Colleagues Does not Belong to Ethics in the Scientific Community

Letter to the Editor Giving Nicknames to Colleagues Does not Belong to Ethics in the Scientific... From the Editors The Archive invites responses to the articles. And we especially invited reactions to the articles published in the Special Issue on “Spirituality.” The editors would like to articulate that constructive criticism, disagreement and dissent are necessary for progress in psychological science, but that such disagreement should be communicated respectfully and in a collegial manner. We have received only one response, which we are glad to publish here. It should be noted also that Pär Salander has accepted the apologies from Ralph Hood, and that Ralph has declined to publish anything that might indicate that he would like to have the last word. Dear Editor, You kindly invited me to write a critical paper on the concept of ‘spirituality’ for a special issue of the journal (2012; 34(1)), which scrutinized the concept and connected research. So I did. I stated in the Introduction that the paper was based on contemporary research in the field of psychosocial oncology and was not a systematic review. It was straightforward and some readers may even find it provocative. Its criticism of part of the research field was nevertheless essential as it was based on studies published in journals accepted by http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archive for the Psychology of Religion Brill

Letter to the Editor Giving Nicknames to Colleagues Does not Belong to Ethics in the Scientific Community

Archive for the Psychology of Religion , Volume 35 (1): 147 – Jan 1, 2013

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/letter-to-the-editor-giving-nicknames-to-colleagues-does-not-belong-to-IqgXwPsn0C

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Subject
Other
ISSN
0084-6724
eISSN
1573-6121
DOI
10.1163/15736121-12341251
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

From the Editors The Archive invites responses to the articles. And we especially invited reactions to the articles published in the Special Issue on “Spirituality.” The editors would like to articulate that constructive criticism, disagreement and dissent are necessary for progress in psychological science, but that such disagreement should be communicated respectfully and in a collegial manner. We have received only one response, which we are glad to publish here. It should be noted also that Pär Salander has accepted the apologies from Ralph Hood, and that Ralph has declined to publish anything that might indicate that he would like to have the last word. Dear Editor, You kindly invited me to write a critical paper on the concept of ‘spirituality’ for a special issue of the journal (2012; 34(1)), which scrutinized the concept and connected research. So I did. I stated in the Introduction that the paper was based on contemporary research in the field of psychosocial oncology and was not a systematic review. It was straightforward and some readers may even find it provocative. Its criticism of part of the research field was nevertheless essential as it was based on studies published in journals accepted by

Journal

Archive for the Psychology of ReligionBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2013

There are no references for this article.