Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

'Zucker' and 'Fräsmaschinen', Did Roman law know 'co-ordinate possession' ('Nebenbesitz')?

'Zucker' and 'Fräsmaschinen', Did Roman law know 'co-ordinate possession' ('Nebenbesitz')? <jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In German legal literature a theory of so-called 'Nebenbesitz' ('co-ordinate possession') is being discussed since more than half a century. It would be applicable when a <jats:italic>detentor</jats:italic>, a lessee e.g., makes a delivery <jats:italic>constituto possessorio</jats:italic> to a new lessor, making him <jats:italic>possessor</jats:italic>, but goes on paying rent to the old lessor, which would leave this lessor in possession. Both possessors would be co-ordinate possessors. Some authors have been referring to Roman law (D. 41,2,32,1) as though it already knew co-ordinate possession. This paper examines the Roman law and <jats:italic>ius commune</jats:italic> sources and concludes they did not know 'Nebenbesitz'.</jats:p> </jats:sec> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Legal History Review / Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit Brill

'Zucker' and 'Fräsmaschinen', Did Roman law know 'co-ordinate possession' ('Nebenbesitz')?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/zucker-and-fr-smaschinen-did-roman-law-know-co-ordinate-possession-Vc8Zz5NlL0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2010 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0040-7585
eISSN
1571-8190
DOI
10.1163/157181910X487387
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In German legal literature a theory of so-called 'Nebenbesitz' ('co-ordinate possession') is being discussed since more than half a century. It would be applicable when a <jats:italic>detentor</jats:italic>, a lessee e.g., makes a delivery <jats:italic>constituto possessorio</jats:italic> to a new lessor, making him <jats:italic>possessor</jats:italic>, but goes on paying rent to the old lessor, which would leave this lessor in possession. Both possessors would be co-ordinate possessors. Some authors have been referring to Roman law (D. 41,2,32,1) as though it already knew co-ordinate possession. This paper examines the Roman law and <jats:italic>ius commune</jats:italic> sources and concludes they did not know 'Nebenbesitz'.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

Journal

The Legal History Review / Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du DroitBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2010

Keywords: ROMAN LAW; GERMAN LAW; DETENTOR; CO-ORDINATE POSSESSION; IUS COMMUNE; DELIVERY CONSTITUTO POSSESSORIO; 'NEBENBESITZ'

There are no references for this article.