Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
281 Judit Udvaros 1 The Possibilities of Forfeiture of Illegaly Obtained Profits in Hungary 1. PUNISHMENTS AMD MEASURES REQARDIMQ FORFEITURE .. _.. 1.1. Forfeiture Penalties and Measures in General ..- , .: .. According to the Hungarian Penal Code2 the penal sanctions to be imposed on perpetrators by the court are penalties and measures. These have been part of the penal regulations since the end of the last century. By enforcing general and special prevention punishments con- stitute the primary sanction, while measures serve the aims of special prevention. Article 38 of the Penal Code differenciates between two categories of penalties: principal and supplementary. - , , .., , ' : , - , . . :' ... : ... , ..... -.. ; ., .. : , , ... 1.2. Confiscation of Assets ; <........ ; ÷ , '_ ..,i; ' . < ....,, .1 ',' ". The prerequisities for the confiscation of assets are regulated under Article 62 of the Penal Code. In this case, general prevention is the main purpose, although it also amounts to a severe pecuniary loss for the perpetrator. Its essence is the confiscation of the perpetrator's s entire assets or a
European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.