Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the Light of the European Convention of Human Rights

The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United... brill.nl/eccl © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 18 (2010) Contents Articles The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the Light of the European Convention of Human Rights 225 Tijs Kooijmans Hostile Intent – the Terrorist’s Achilles Heel? Observations on Pre-Crime Surveillance by Means of Thought Recognition 237 Ralf Kölbel and Susanne Selter Racist Crimes in the Finnish Criminal Justice System – Analysis of Cases Reported to the Police in Helsinki in 2006 261 Laura Peutere and Juha Kääriäinen Secondary Victimization and Victim Assistance 281 J. Tamarit, C. Villacampa and G. Filella New Criminological Literature in Europe Selected Bibliography 299 Elisabeth Martin Erratum 309 brill.nl/eccl © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010 DOI: 10.1163/157181710X12767720265923 The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the Light of the European Convention of Human Rights Tijs Kooijmans Professor of Criminal Law, Tilburg University, The Netherlands 1. Introduction The system of criminal sanctions constitutes the final element of the criminal justice system. In the Netherlands, the system of criminal sanctions consists of two categories of sanctions: penalties http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Brill

The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the Light of the European Convention of Human Rights

Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-burden-of-proof-in-confiscation-cases-a-comparison-between-the-fGNDqPmb0q

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2010 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0928-9569
eISSN
1571-8174
DOI
10.1163/157181710X12767720265923
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

brill.nl/eccl © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 18 (2010) Contents Articles The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the Light of the European Convention of Human Rights 225 Tijs Kooijmans Hostile Intent – the Terrorist’s Achilles Heel? Observations on Pre-Crime Surveillance by Means of Thought Recognition 237 Ralf Kölbel and Susanne Selter Racist Crimes in the Finnish Criminal Justice System – Analysis of Cases Reported to the Police in Helsinki in 2006 261 Laura Peutere and Juha Kääriäinen Secondary Victimization and Victim Assistance 281 J. Tamarit, C. Villacampa and G. Filella New Criminological Literature in Europe Selected Bibliography 299 Elisabeth Martin Erratum 309 brill.nl/eccl © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010 DOI: 10.1163/157181710X12767720265923 The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the Light of the European Convention of Human Rights Tijs Kooijmans Professor of Criminal Law, Tilburg University, The Netherlands 1. Introduction The system of criminal sanctions constitutes the final element of the criminal justice system. In the Netherlands, the system of criminal sanctions consists of two categories of sanctions: penalties

Journal

European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.