Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/brill/mikuli-v-croatia-77k4aMpUUU
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- Brill
- Copyright
- © 2002 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
- ISSN
- 0965-934X
- eISSN
- 1571-8131
- DOI
- 10.1163/157181302760446311
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
[ ] MIKULIC v. CROATIA Right to a fair trial – violation Article 6, Section 1 Right to respect for private life – violation Article 8 Right to an effective remedy – violation Article 13 The present case differs from the Court’s previous paternity cases in so far as no family tie had been established between the applicant and her alleged father. However, Article 8 protected not only “fam- ily” but also “private” life. There appeared to be no reason of principle why the notion of “private life” should be taken to exclude the determination of the legal relationship between a child born out of wedlock and her natural father. In a judgment delivered on February in the case of Mikulic´ v. Croatia , the European Court of Human Rights unanimously held that there had been a: – violation of Article , Section (right to a determination of civil rights within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights; – violation of Article (right to respect for private life) of the Convention; and – violation of Article (right to an effective remedy) in respect of the
Journal
Human Rights Case Digest – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2002