Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Knauth v. Germany

Knauth v. Germany    [  ] KNAUTH v. GERMANY BESTER v. GERMANY Right to respect for private life – inadmissible Article 8 Civil servants dismissed for having collaborated with the Ministry of Security of the GDR and for having denied this On  November  a Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights unani- mously declared inadmissible the applications in the cases of Knauth v. Germany and Bester v. Germany . Summary of the facts The two applicants, both former civil servants of the German Democratic Repub- lic (GDR), were integrated into the civil service of the Federal Republic of German (FRG) after the reunification of Germany. Both answered in the negative when asked in a questionnaire, prior to their integration, whether they had collaborated with the Ministry of Security of the GDR. An examination of the data contained in documents of the Ministry of Security revealed their past collaboration with that ministry. The first applicant, an infant school teacher, had been registered as a collaborator of the Ministry of Security between  and  . The second appli- cant had effected his military service in the People’s Army of the GDR between  and  and http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Rights Case Digest Brill

Knauth v. Germany

Human Rights Case Digest , Volume 12 (11-12): 1109 – Jan 1, 2001

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/knauth-v-germany-dXmomB0ZqI

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2001 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0965-934X
eISSN
1571-8131
DOI
10.1163/157181301401748360
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

   [  ] KNAUTH v. GERMANY BESTER v. GERMANY Right to respect for private life – inadmissible Article 8 Civil servants dismissed for having collaborated with the Ministry of Security of the GDR and for having denied this On  November  a Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights unani- mously declared inadmissible the applications in the cases of Knauth v. Germany and Bester v. Germany . Summary of the facts The two applicants, both former civil servants of the German Democratic Repub- lic (GDR), were integrated into the civil service of the Federal Republic of German (FRG) after the reunification of Germany. Both answered in the negative when asked in a questionnaire, prior to their integration, whether they had collaborated with the Ministry of Security of the GDR. An examination of the data contained in documents of the Ministry of Security revealed their past collaboration with that ministry. The first applicant, an infant school teacher, had been registered as a collaborator of the Ministry of Security between  and  . The second appli- cant had effected his military service in the People’s Army of the GDR between  and  and

Journal

Human Rights Case DigestBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.