Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Dallos v. Hungary

Dallos v. Hungary 169 12 hrcd [ 2001 ] DALLOS v. HUNGARY Right to a fair trial – no violation Article 6, Sections 1 and 3 Supreme Court, which had the power to replace the applicant’s conviction with an acquittal, reviewed the case and the applicant had the opportunity to defend himself before the Supreme Court in relation to the reformulated charge. In a judgment delivered on 1 March 2001 in the case of Dallos v. Hungary , the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously, that there had been no viola- tion of Article 6 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights. 1. Principal facts The case concerns an application brought by Zoltán Dallos, a Hungarian national, born in 1949 and living in Vonyarcvashegy, Hungary. The applicant was convicted of aggravated embezzlement. He appealed to the Regional Court, which upheld the conviction and sentence, but reclassified the offence as aggravated fraud. The court held that the facts outlined in the indictment constituted this offence. The applicant lodged a petition for review with the Supreme Court which, after hearing an address by the applicant’s lawyer at a public session, upheld the conviction. 2. Procedure of the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Rights Case Digest Brill

Dallos v. Hungary

Human Rights Case Digest , Volume 12 (3-4): 169 – Jan 1, 2001

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/dallos-v-hungary-aRGhhs7jyi

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2001 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0965-934X
eISSN
1571-8131
DOI
10.1163/157181301401012492
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

169 12 hrcd [ 2001 ] DALLOS v. HUNGARY Right to a fair trial – no violation Article 6, Sections 1 and 3 Supreme Court, which had the power to replace the applicant’s conviction with an acquittal, reviewed the case and the applicant had the opportunity to defend himself before the Supreme Court in relation to the reformulated charge. In a judgment delivered on 1 March 2001 in the case of Dallos v. Hungary , the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously, that there had been no viola- tion of Article 6 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights. 1. Principal facts The case concerns an application brought by Zoltán Dallos, a Hungarian national, born in 1949 and living in Vonyarcvashegy, Hungary. The applicant was convicted of aggravated embezzlement. He appealed to the Regional Court, which upheld the conviction and sentence, but reclassified the offence as aggravated fraud. The court held that the facts outlined in the indictment constituted this offence. The applicant lodged a petition for review with the Supreme Court which, after hearing an address by the applicant’s lawyer at a public session, upheld the conviction. 2. Procedure of the

Journal

Human Rights Case DigestBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.