Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Prinz v. Austria

Prinz v. Austria 55 11 hrcd [ 2000 ] PRINZ v. AUSTRIA Right to a fair trial – no violation Article 6, Section 1 Right to a fair trial – no violation Article 6, Section 3(c) The Court found there were no special reasons warranting the applicant’s personal appearance at a hearing before the Supreme Court concerning his plea of nullity and his appeal in the Supreme Court, as his interests were safeguarded by his legal representative. In a judgment delivered on 8 February 2000 in the case of Prinz v. Austria , the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had not been a violation of Article 6 , Section 1 taken together with Article 6 , Section 3 (c) (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights. This judgment is not final. Pursuant to Article 43 , Section 1 of the Convention, within three months from the date of the judgment of a Chamber, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber. 1. Principal facts The applicant, Josef Prinz, is an Austrian national. He was born in 1945 and is detained in http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Rights Case Digest Brill

Prinz v. Austria

Human Rights Case Digest , Volume 11 (1-2): 55 – Jan 1, 2000

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/prinz-v-austria-4oOFMwowpV

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2000 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0965-934X
eISSN
1571-8131
DOI
10.1163/15718130020617260
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

55 11 hrcd [ 2000 ] PRINZ v. AUSTRIA Right to a fair trial – no violation Article 6, Section 1 Right to a fair trial – no violation Article 6, Section 3(c) The Court found there were no special reasons warranting the applicant’s personal appearance at a hearing before the Supreme Court concerning his plea of nullity and his appeal in the Supreme Court, as his interests were safeguarded by his legal representative. In a judgment delivered on 8 February 2000 in the case of Prinz v. Austria , the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had not been a violation of Article 6 , Section 1 taken together with Article 6 , Section 3 (c) (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights. This judgment is not final. Pursuant to Article 43 , Section 1 of the Convention, within three months from the date of the judgment of a Chamber, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber. 1. Principal facts The applicant, Josef Prinz, is an Austrian national. He was born in 1945 and is detained in

Journal

Human Rights Case DigestBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.