Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
55 11 hrcd [ 2000 ] PRINZ v. AUSTRIA Right to a fair trial – no violation Article 6, Section 1 Right to a fair trial – no violation Article 6, Section 3(c) The Court found there were no special reasons warranting the applicant’s personal appearance at a hearing before the Supreme Court concerning his plea of nullity and his appeal in the Supreme Court, as his interests were safeguarded by his legal representative. In a judgment delivered on 8 February 2000 in the case of Prinz v. Austria , the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had not been a violation of Article 6 , Section 1 taken together with Article 6 , Section 3 (c) (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights. This judgment is not final. Pursuant to Article 43 , Section 1 of the Convention, within three months from the date of the judgment of a Chamber, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber. 1. Principal facts The applicant, Josef Prinz, is an Austrian national. He was born in 1945 and is detained in
Human Rights Case Digest – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.