Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Health policy is influenced by many sources. However, a prerequisite for a healthy health sector is an open dialogue, also in public. The opposite undermines the principle of patient rights, and squandering legitimation for the health sector and the physicians, too. The Scandinavian-Model is often mentioned in ensuring the citizen's rights, and open-minded debates. However, it may now and then be disrepected too much by the principals in power. We therefore found it of interest to report some concrete cases from the last decade, where physicians in Denmark exercised their right of freedom of speech, and as a consequence being dismissed, on the grounds of un-cooperativeness, but actually should be seen as a form of censure.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
European Journal of Health Law – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1998
Keywords: societies; patient-rights; politics; consumer-satisfaction; public-policy; ethics; physician's-role; employment; government-legislation-and-jurisprudence; research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.