Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Kimmel, D. Pruitt, J. Magenau, Ellen Konar-Goldband, P. Carnevale (1980)
Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38
Dee Appley (1977)
Beyond CultureThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13
(1996)
Americans Don’t Apologize, Japanese Apologize Easily (in Japanese) Soshisya
M. Morris, Tanya Menon, D. Ames (2001)
Culturally Conferred Conceptions of Agency: A Key to Social Perception of Persons, Groups, and Other ActorsPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 5
(2010)
Toyota Apologizes, Begins Fix on Other Hybrids.
L. Ross, L. Berkowitz, Psychology Academic (1977)
The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process”, in Ed), Advances in Experimental Social New York, pp. .
Steven Heine, D. Lehman, K. Peng, J. Greenholtz (2002)
What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect.Journal of personality and social psychology, 82 6
R. Ide (1998)
'Sorry for your kindness' : Japanese interactional ritual in public discourseJournal of Pragmatics, 29
(1977)
“ The Intuitive Scientist and His Shortcomings
(1993)
Hougen danwa ni miru shazaiteki kansha hyougen no sentaku (The Use of Apology-Gratitude Expresssions in Dialects)
J. Brett (2001)
Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deals, Resolve Disputes, and Make Decisions Across Cultural Boundaries
D. Ferrin, P. Kim, Cecily Cooper, K. Dirks (2007)
Silence speaks volumes: the effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 4
H. Markus, S. Kitayama (1991)
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review, 98
K. Dirks, P. Kim, D. Ferrin, Cecily Cooper (2011)
Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgressionOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114
J. Holmes (1989)
Sex Differences and Apologies: One Aspect of Communicative Competence1Applied Linguistics, 10
P. Kim, D. Ferrin, Cecily Cooper, K. Dirks (2004)
Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 1
(2009)
Panel criticizes oversight of Citi by two executives.
Tanya Menon, M. Morris, C. Chiu, Ying-yi Hong (1999)
Culture and the construal of agency : Attribution to individual versus group dispositionsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76
(2010)
With Recall Expanding, Toyota Gives an Apology.
Yuriko Zemba, M. Young, M. Morris (2006)
Blaming leaders for organizational accidents: Proxy logic in collective- versus individual-agency culturesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101
P. Kim, K. Dirks, Cecily Cooper, D. Ferrin (2006)
When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99
M. Schweitzer, J. Hershey, Eric Bradlow (2004)
Promises and Lies: Restoring Violated TrustBehavioral & Experimental Economics
S. Scher, J. Darley (1997)
How Effective Are the Things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech ActJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26
(2010)
An Apology, or Sorts, by Bankers.
C. Kay, I. Wotherspoon (2004)
The Oxford English Dictionary OnlineLit. Linguistic Comput., 19
Naomi Sugimoto (1997)
A Japan-U.S. Comparison of Apology StylesCommunication Research, 24
William Ury, J. Brett, S. Goldberg (1993)
Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict
John Butler (1999)
Trust Expectations, Information Sharing, Climate of Trust, and Negotiation Effectiveness and EfficiencyGroup & Organization Management, 24
William Maddux, Elizabeth Mullen, A. Galinsky (2007)
Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44
J. Robbennolt (2003)
Apologies and Legal Settlement: An Empirical ExaminationMichigan Law Review, 102
S. Gregory (1982)
Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related valuesDesign Studies, 3
C. Chiu, Ying-yi Hong (2006)
Social Psychology of Culture
R. Nisbett, K. Peng, I. Choi, A. Norenzayan (2001)
Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition.Psychological review, 108 2
D. Barnlund, Miho Yoshioka (1990)
Apologies : Japanese and American stylesInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14
C. Chiu, M. Morris, Ying-yi Hong, Tanya Menon (2000)
Motivated cultural cognition: the impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure.Journal of personality and social psychology, 78 2
(2008)
The Heart and Mind of the Negotiator
Steven Heine, S. Kitayama, D. Lehman, T. Takata, Eugene Ide, Cecilia Leung, Hisaya Matsumoto (2001)
Divergent consequences of success and failure in japan and north america: an investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves.Journal of personality and social psychology, 81 4
S. Kitayama (2002)
Culture and basic psychological processes--toward a system view of culture: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002).Psychological bulletin, 128 1
Michael Haselhuhn, M. Schweitzer, Alison Wood (2010)
How Implicit Beliefs Influence Trust RecoveryPsychological Science, 21
L. Weiss (1983)
Getting Past "No"Women & Therapy, 1
W. Lonner, J. Berry, G. Hofstede (1980)
Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
P. Gries, K. Peng (2002)
Culture Clash? Apologies East and WestJournal of Contemporary China, 11
Ryan Fehr, M. Gelfand (2010)
When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims' self-construals facilitates forgivenessOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113
P. Kim, K. Dirks, Cecily Cooper (2009)
The Repair of Trust: A Dynamic Bilateral Perspective and Multilevel ConceptualizationAcademy of Management Review, 34
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>One of the most effective means for re-establishing trust in negotiations and disputes is by making an apology. However, the function and meaning of an apology (and thus its effectiveness for negotiators) may differ across cultures. We hypothesized that people from an individual-agency culture (such as the United States) understand apologies as analytic mechanisms for assigning blame and re-establishing personal credibility. In contrast, apologies in collective-agency cultures (such as Japan) are understood to be general expressions of remorse rather than a means to assign culpability. A survey of Japanese and Americans found that, compared to Americans, Japanese apologized more often and were more likely to apologize for actions in which they were not involved; on the other hand, Americans were more likely than Japanese to equate apologizing with personal blame. A subsequent experimental study showed that these cultural differences in the function and meaning of apologies have implications for trust repair in disputes: apologies for integrity violations led to greater trust repair for Japanese than for Americans, but apologies for competence violations were somewhat more effective for Americans than Japanese. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
International Negotiation – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2011
Keywords: conflict; trust; culture; apologies; negotiations
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.