Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Pohl (2006)
Islamic Education and Civil Society: Reflections on the Pesantren Tradition in Contemporary IndonesiaComparative Education Review, 50
Peter Altena, C. Hermans (2003)
Ritual Education in a Pluralistic SocietyInternational Journal of Education and Religion, 4
U. Wagner, A. Zick (1995)
The relation of formal education to ethnic prejudice: Its reliability, validity and explanationEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 25
R. Hefner (2001)
Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in IndonesiaThe Journal of Asian Studies, 61
Agnieszka Kanas, P. Scheepers, C. Sterkens (2015)
Interreligious Contact, Perceived Group Threat, and Perceived DiscriminationSocial Psychology Quarterly, 78
W. Wardekker, S. Miedema (2001)
Identity, Cultural Change, and Religious EducationBritish Journal of Religious Education, 23
E. Bogardus (1933)
A social distance scale.Sociology and social research
Nicole Tausch, M. Hewstone, R. Roy (2009)
The relationships between contact, status and prejudice: An integrated threat theory analysis of Hindu-Muslim relations in IndiaJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19
T. Yamagishi, M. Yamagishi (1994)
Trust and commitment in the United States and JapanMotivation and Emotion, 18
Michael Grimmitt (1994)
Religious education and the ideology of pluralismBritish Journal of Religious Education, 16
C. Hermans, C. Sterkens (2014)
Comparison in Religion: A Methodological ContributionJournal of Empirical Theology, 27
M. Abanes, P. Scheepers, C. Sterkens (2014)
Ethno-religious groups, identification, trust and social distance in the ethno-religiously stratified PhilippinesResearch in Social Stratification and Mobility, 37
C. Tredoux, G. Finchilescu (2007)
The Contact Hypothesis and Intergroup Relations 50 Years on: Introduction to the Special IssueSouth African Journal of Psychology, 37
T. Pettigrew, Linda Tropp, Santa Nia, Linda Cruz, Tropp, F. Pettigrew, Stephen Wright, Rebecca Boice, Geoffrey Burcaw, Susan Burton, Darcy Ca-Bral, Robert Chang, Daniel Cheron, Vanessa Lee, Kimberly Lincoln, Peter Moore, Danielle Murray, Neal Nakano, Rajinder Samra, Michael Sarette, Christine Schmitt, Amanda Stout, Gina Vittori, Greg Kim, A. Kohányi, Daphne Malinsky, Mark Pettigrew, Sue Duval, Blair Johnson, David Kenny, Jack, Jack Dovidio, Samuel Gaertner, M. Hewstone, Brian Mullen
Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes a Meta-analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory
A. Seligman (2021)
The Problem of Trust
G. Āllport (1966)
The religious context of prejudicePastoral Psychology, 18
Francis-Vincent Anthony, C. Hermans, C. Sterkens (2014)
Religion and Conflict Attribution: An Empirical Study of the Religious Meaning System of Christian, Muslim and Hindu Students in Tamil Nadu, India
A. Mastekaasa (2011)
Social Origins and Labour Market Success—Stability and Change over Norwegian Birth Cohorts 1950–1969European Sociological Review, 27
Katharina Schmid, Nicole Tausch, M. Hewstone (2009)
The Social Psychology of intergroup relations
Syed Maudoodi, K. Ahmad (1988)
Towards Understanding Islam
M. Weber
The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York (Scribner’s) 1920.
G. Āllport, J. Ross (1967)
Personal religious orientation and prejudice.Journal of personality and social psychology, 5 4
P. Scheepers, M. Gijsberts, M. Coenders (2002)
Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries. Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic ThreatEuropean Sociological Review, 18
L. Bobo, Camille Zubrinsky (1996)
Attitudes on Residential Integration: Perceived Status Differences, Mere In-Group Preference, or Racial Prejudice?Social Forces, 74
Michael Savelkoul, Maurice Gesthuizen, P. Scheepers (2011)
Explaining relationships between ethnic diversity and informal social capital across European countries and regions: Tests of constrict, conflict and contact theorySocial Science Research, 40
C. Hermans (2003)
Participatory Learning: Religious Education in a Globalizing Society
Michael Savelkoul, P. Scheepers, J. Tolsma, L. Hagendoorn (2011)
Anti-Muslim attitudes in the Netherlands: Tests of contradictory hypotheses derived from ethnic competition theory and intergroup contact theoryEuropean Sociological Review, 27
Edward Telles (2012)
The overlapping concepts of race and colour in Latin AmericaEthnic and Racial Studies, 35
D. Putnam (2007)
Pluribus Unum : Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century The 2006
M. Ramstedt (2013)
Picard, Michel, and Rémy Madinier (eds.): The politics of religion in Indonesia : syncretism, orthodoxy, and religious contention in Java and Bali. London : Routledge, 2011 [Book Review]
C. Sterkens (2001)
Interreligious Learning: The Problem of Interreligious Dialogue in Primary Education
E. Bogardus (1947)
Measurement of personal-group relations., 10
W. Pedersen (1996)
Working-class Boys at the Margins: Ethnic Prejudice, Cultural Capital, and GenderActa Sociologica, 39
C. Sterkens, Francis-Vincent Anthony (2008)
A Comparative Study of Religiocentrism among Christian, Muslim and Hindu Students in Tamil Nadu, IndiaJournal of Empirical Theology, 21
Allport (1966)
The religious context of prejudiceJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5
T. Pettigrew (1997)
Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on PrejudicePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23
This article analyses Indonesian students’ preferences for different types of religious education, with the help of their personal characteristics and inter-group attitudes. We investigate a comparative understanding of Muslim, Christian and Hindu students of different types of religious education. The comparative measurement of different models of religious education shows that the mono-religious model consists of all aspects of religious education. A remarkable result is that in all models, the attitudinal aspect (sometimes together with the affective) is the most dominant aspect. The cognitive aspect is absent in the inter-religious model. On average, all Muslim, Christian and Hindu students prefer the mono-religious over the inter-religious model. For the mono-religious model, the negative evaluation of religious plurality is the strongest predictor; and indeed, is the only aspect to contribute to the preference for the mono-religious model among Muslims. The attitude towards pluralism is the most important predictor of the preference for a mono-religious model among Christians. This result is in contrast with our hypothesis. As for Hindu respondents, the centrality of own religion has the most positive correlation with the mono-religious model. Pluralism is the most influential factor for the inter-religious model among all groups.
Journal of Empirical Theology – Brill
Published: Jun 5, 2015
Keywords: Comparative research; types of religious education; inter-group attitudes; Muslims; Christians; Hindus
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.